Dear all,
xinput calibrator is a generic touchscreen calibration program for X.Org
v0.6.0 is now available at
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xinput_calibrator
The project's aim is to supersede all hacked-up driver-specific
calibrators out there, and it has already achieved this in
On 1 March 2010 03:04, Russell Shaw rjs...@netspace.net.au wrote:
Interesting
http://web.archive.org/web/20080413140042/http://people.freedesktop.org/~jg/roadmap.html#mozTocId778727
I put the archive.org link into the Wikipedia article because the
original fell off the web. Is there another
All,
I'm working in a project which study energy saving on PCs. I saw a
strange thing which was opposite to my intuition: when PC working on
graphic mode, it would be more energy saving.
When in graphic mode, on my PC, it is 52w; when I switched to terminal
mode(on linux alt-ctrl-1), it is 55w.
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 05:48:50PM -0500, Richard Brown wrote:
To our much dismay we have recently found after attempting to install
new Linux boxes that these extensions no longer appear to be available.
This has caused most of our internal applications to blow up and to be
Zhi Li, le Mon 01 Mar 2010 17:06:57 +0800, a écrit :
When in graphic mode, on my PC, it is 52w; when I switched to terminal
mode(on linux alt-ctrl-1), it is 55w.
Just to make sure: is it really terminal mode and not just a
framebuffer? cat /sys/class/vtconsole/*/bind to check which driver is
To get higherVMware X display resolutions I had to add these to
the xorg.conf file inside my virtual machine:
Section Monitor
Identifier Monitor0
VendorName Monitor Vendor
ModelNameMonitor Model
HorizSync10 - 300
VertRefresh 10 - 200
Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 05:48:50PM -0500, Richard Brown wrote:
To our much dismay we have recently found after attempting to install
new Linux boxes that these extensions no longer appear to be available.
This has caused most of our internal applications
Again I apologise about my previous letters.
I do have some other ideas which I think are better conceived and
thought out, and could be useful to a lot of people. I would like to
hear what X.org people thinking of these ideas.
1) A VNC server display driver which can be used simultaneously
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 05:06:57PM +0800, Zhi Li wrote:
All,
I'm working in a project which study energy saving on PCs. I saw a
strange thing which was opposite to my intuition: when PC working on
graphic mode, it would be more energy saving.
When in graphic mode, on my PC, it is 52w;
This already exists, it's just not bundled with X.Org due to the different
license - TigerVNC uses current Xorg sources to build both Xvnc and a
vnc.so loadable extension module that are compatible with current servers
and extensions. http://www.tigervnc.com/
(Providing you don't have any
I will respond to both Alan Coopersmith and Alan Cox in this letter:
Alan Cox wrote:
This already exists, it's just not bundled with X.Org due to the different
license - TigerVNC uses current Xorg sources to build both Xvnc and a
vnc.so loadable extension module that are compatible with
Zhi Li wrote:
All,
I'm working in a project which study energy saving on PCs. I saw a
strange thing which was opposite to my intuition: when PC working on
graphic mode, it would be more energy saving.
When in graphic mode, on my PC, it is 52w; when I switched to terminal
mode(on linux
On 03/01/2010 11:06 AM, Zhi Li wrote:
All,
I'm working in a project which study energy saving on PCs. I saw a
strange thing which was opposite to my intuition: when PC working on
graphic mode, it would be more energy saving.
When in graphic mode, on my PC, it is 52w; when I switched to
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 23:28 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
Could anyone explain to me what the attached log means?
X 7.5 detects a rich array of BIOS modes, but then runs through a list
of modes and says no mode of this name. Should it be using something
like 104 or 104 (1024x768) instead of,
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 14:40 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 23:28 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
Could anyone explain to me what the attached log means?
X 7.5 detects a rich array of BIOS modes, but then runs through a list
of modes and says no mode of this name. Should it
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:41:02AM -0700, David Mohr wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:29:12PM -0700, David Mohr wrote:
I'm part of the minory who currently uses a Zaphod style dual monitor
setup with separate
Hi Felix
Thanks again for our reply with info.
I have these tasks running:
root 950 0.0 0.1 8548 1936 ?SFeb26 0:00
/usr/lib/gdm/gdm-simple-slave --display-id
/org/gnome/DisplayManager/Display1
root 969 2.2 2.1 33420 22256 tty7 Ss+ Feb26 95:34
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:41:02AM -0700, David Mohr wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:29:12PM -0700, David Mohr wrote:
I'm part of
18 matches
Mail list logo
