Hi all,
To clean things up a bit, we will be moving the following lists from
lists.freedesktop.org to lists.x.org on Tuesday afternoon European
time:
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
xorg-annou...@lists.freedesktop.org
xorg-com...@lists.freedesktop.org
x...@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi,
On 2 December 2011 18:34, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 06:19:44PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi all,
To clean things up a bit, we will be moving the following lists from
lists.freedesktop.org to lists.x.org on Tuesday afternoon European
time
else.
Distributions are strongly, strongly recommended to upgrade, including
in stable series.
Alan Coopersmith (1):
Replace repeated checks for gcc with _X_ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF from xproto
Alistair Leslie-Hughes (1):
xkbcomp: Stop possible overflow in yyGetnumber. #31647
Daniel Stone
.
Distributions are strongly recommended to push 1.2.3 instead of 1.2.2,
whose tarballs have been removed from the archive.
Daniel Stone (3):
Constify LookupKeysym input argument
Interp: Allow explicit Any/NoSymbol mappings
Bump to 1.2.3
git tag: xkbcomp-1.2.3
http
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:17:30PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
This is an semi-urgent bugfix release for the two commits of mine, which
fix a particularly bad failure in the compat code. If you had a
SymInterpret definition (i.e. to map a keysym to an action, as used for
VT switch
else.
Distributions are strongly, strongly recommended to upgrade, including
in stable series.
Alan Coopersmith (1):
Replace repeated checks for gcc with _X_ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF from xproto
Alistair Leslie-Hughes (1):
xkbcomp: Stop possible overflow in yyGetnumber. #31647
Daniel Stone
.
Distributions are strongly recommended to push 1.2.3 instead of 1.2.2,
whose tarballs have been removed from the archive.
Daniel Stone (3):
Constify LookupKeysym input argument
Interp: Allow explicit Any/NoSymbol mappings
Bump to 1.2.3
git tag: xkbcomp-1.2.3
http
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:17:30PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
This is an semi-urgent bugfix release for the two commits of mine, which
fix a particularly bad failure in the compat code. If you had a
SymInterpret definition (i.e. to map a keysym to an action, as used for
VT switch
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:22:43PM +0530, nijil yes wrote:
I am interested in working on the idea mentioned on summer of code page on
replacing CMS code inside libX11 with libXcm.I would be glad to get a few
more
details on the work involved and such things.If there is anyone already
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:02:58PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Yes. Tollef's opinion was that quitting was a copout and that I should
instead go fix
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:24:24AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
All arguments were made, extensively, before.
Except maybe for one:
The claimed reason
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:02:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:47:25AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
If you actually wanted to find out, you could go ask someone,
First the following question needs to be answered: who owns (not pw0wn,
we found that out already
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:43:07PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:36:32AM -0800, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
wrote:
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org 2011-02-09 06:36:31
PST ---
done
Root access restored, i presume?
Yes. Tollef's
Hi,
I've been mostly offline whilst moving, so have only read this through
web archives. As mentioned on IRC earlier, it was my account used.
My apologies: as ajax said, it's indefensible, and am not really sure
what else to say. I've suspended my root accounts as well.
That being said:
On
Hi,
Just a small maintenance release for libX11; pending any catastrophic
bugs, this will probably be the last release from the 1.3.x branch. The
XStringToKeysym changes should provide a not-insignificant speedup for
X server and application startup.
Daniel Stone (6):
XStringToKeysym
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 08:27:47PM -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
If I turn global autorepeat off while a key is already being repeated,
the key doesn't stop repeating. It continues on and on.
At least according to XKB, I believe that's correct; almost all XKB
actions are specified to not affect
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:19:40PM -0400, Daniel Clark wrote:
2010/3/16 Bridgman, John john.bridg...@amd.com:
Ahh, that makes sense -- so the relicensing from X11 to GPLv2 already
happened, and the proposed relicensing was going to be from GPLv2 to v3.
Asking if the code can be
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:49:13PM -0400, Brett Smith wrote:
When we started looking at software for the SiliconMotion hardware (as
part of evaluating how free software-friendly a particular machine was),
we found a modified driver from the SiliconMotion company that seemed to
have some
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:35:08AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Luc Verhaegen wrote:
members@ is basically a dead list, except around elections. I personally
am all for re-using it. Also, an archive of the ml would be handy too.
There is an archive, it's just hard to find due to the way
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 07:52:02AM -0600, Pat Kane wrote:
Ross Boylan r...@biostat.ucsf.edu wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x in ?? ()
(gdb) where
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x0051a72a in DoConfigure ()
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 05:48:50PM -0500, Richard Brown wrote:
To our much dismay we have recently found after attempting to install
new Linux boxes that these extensions no longer appear to be available.
This has caused most of our internal applications to blow up and to be
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:05:42AM -0500, paul rogers wrote:
My system(s) is LFS based. I think it's time to upgrade. My 6.8.2 is
brmonolithic, and I certainly see the advantage of not being required to
brdownload the whole thing just to get some updated parts, particularly
bras I'm on
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:27:24PM -0800, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:45, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
If you feel this is unacceptable and are looking to assign blame, the
mail archives back me up that the entire thing was entirely my idea
Hi Egbert,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:13:41AM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:18:47PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
I'm pretty uncomfortable with the suggestion here. No, wait, very
uncomfortable. (Not to mention that if any misuse of funds _did_ go on
here
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:33:05PM +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:
On Feb 18, 10 21:45:07 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
$US24k for travel sponsorship
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:26:30AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
Please, whenever you want more information from the board, please just
ask. I can give you my personal assurance that there's no desire on the
part of the board to
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:28:19PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:29:14PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
I believe some things have been asked for already:
* minutes or logs.
Bart is collating his logs
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
$US24k for travel
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:05:14PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Chris Ball wrote:
expo (the 2U machine) was there originally, and this serves the
needs of *.x.org fairly well. The 3U machines were donated by
Sun and were earmarked for backup, redundancy, sharing fd.o
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:54:18PM +0200, Nameer Yarkon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Jackson a...@nwnk.net wrote:
most memory access goes through the PCI BAR resource files in sysfs, but
i was expecting that if /dev/mem was abonded, then you will probably
have to call mmap()
Hi,
(Speaking as an ex-Board member.)
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:54:27AM +0100, ps wrote:
As X.Org is the successor of the XConsortium, I expect there should be a
roadmap of where X Window development is heading and how much money is
needed to reach these goals and how these funds are
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:45:09PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:07:32 +0100 Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
On Feb 16, 10 07:26:35 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Our outstanding obligations today are MIT hosting for this year ($3000)
and travel expenses for FOSDEM 2010
[I started a longer reply, but apathy took over.]
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:53:55AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
I just wonder what Xorg's intended endgame is? The direct equivalent
of what MS Windows had for a decade or longer, with everything that
made Unix/X11 stand out being removed?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:11:38PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:01:28PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:45:09PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Seems pretty extrodinary. Exactly what can't say bluehost provide at
$3.95 a month that MIT can at $250
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:
On Feb 16, 10 09:20:44 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:54:56 +0100, Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
But something like $100 / month sounds like a reasonable upper limit for
me, and you should
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:26:46PM -0600, David Nicol wrote:
It seems that the X bylaws allow for outsider participation,
Yeah, they do.
perhaps
to provide oversight to mitigate developer-driven coolitis (not as bad
a malady as featuritis, but still suboptimal), and that has attracted
me.
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:29:40PM +0300, Peter Vypov wrote:
I have a problem with keyboard LEDs: they don't work under X Window
System. They don't turn on when I press Caps Lock, Num Lock or Scroll
Lock. But they do work under virtualizers like VMware or QEMU (If I
press Num Lock, the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 01:46:21PM -0600, David Nicol wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
(If
people want to get paid for hacking X, just mention it and you'll have
quite a few companies beating down your door ...)
You must be exaggerating
(tl;dr: Yes, I agree that the Foundation needs to be doing a lot more,
but nothing we've done is hidden from our members, i.e. board
members know basically as much as you, and that this is a result
of lack of time/etc, rather than any desire to keep any
information
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:42:33AM -0600, David Nicol wrote:
A vote for David Nicol is a vote for transparency!
Full transparency into exactly what all the board members know still
wouldn't tell you much more than what you already know.
Cheers,
Daniel
pgpDyxf8wm54o.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:56:08PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
I have no idea when such meetings are supposed to be held, how regular
there are. No such information is available publically, or at least not
available to my knowledge.
#xorg-bod on OFTC, fortnightly. I think it's
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 03:17:16PM -0800, Stuart Kreitman wrote:
On 02/10/10 11:47 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:31:32PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
The X.org Foundation exists to best represent the interests of the X.org
Foundation members, by being the legal
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:14:58AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
Disclaimer: All of this is off the top of my head. I could be and am
probably wrong on some of the details. This does not represent an
official statement on behalf of the Foundation, etc, etc.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:18:01AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
Is remote execution of X clients away from the X server still regarded
as a design goal, or does everyone just develop for client applications
that only run on or close to the X server machine?
With a unicode text widget, every
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:04:41AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:53:11AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
One can make their own widget libraries based on Xlib, then write apps
using the libraries. Nothing hard about that (hard is relative;)
It's
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:13:23AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
This means abstracting
everything with pointer indirections leading to slow
Any performance problems you may have are not caused by excessive
pointer dereferences.
feature-bare toolkits.
Which features are you missing from current
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:10:11PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
None of this really matters because i don't care if i'm the only one that
uses this stuff. I'd prefer to be ignored as a troll because I have a better
job than programming all day and just hack on it as a hobby for my own use.
Would
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:19:48PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:58 -0500, Adrian Sud wrote:
Any googling and browsing of FAQs finds ways to disable the 2nd mouse button
entirely, or map the 2nd mouse button to another button (causing all other
functions tied to the 2nd
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:22:56AM +0100, Crypto wrote:
I am not sure if this is related to xorg, maybe it is related to KDE, Gnome
etc.
I often connect an external USB keyboard to my notebook for faster typing.
In KDE etc. (i.e. GUI) applications it is often possible to re-assign
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:41:04PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
Forget widget toolkits. They're totally lame wrappers that hide
all the useful functionality from you, run like a waterlogged
sheep, and otherwise assume you don't want to get anything really
nontrivial running this month.
You
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:53:11AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
Glynn Clements wrote:
Russell Shaw wrote:
Forget widget toolkits. They're totally lame wrappers that hide
all the useful functionality from you, run like a waterlogged
sheep, and otherwise assume you don't want to get anything
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:09:47AM +0100, Dirk De Becker wrote:
I am trying to use the intel driver (version 2.9.1) on a gentoo system
with xorg version 1.6.3.901-r2.
If I startx, I get the following output on screen (and X obviously does
not start):
Setting master
expected keysym, got
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:54:00PM -0500, Jim Duda wrote:
Thanks for the post Dan.
I tried both of these, removing XKeysymDB and rebuilding libX11.
Unfortunately, neither of these worked. I get the same errors.
The version I downloaded was more recent that the version which
comes with
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:01:08PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
When i do xpyinfo, i get 29 visuals the same:
[...]
Why isn't there just one of each type of visual?
If you look at the output of glxinfo, you'll see that each visual has
different GL attributes.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:00:25AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:58:08AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
+if test $cross_compiling != yes; then
This should be if ! test x$cross_compiling = xyes.
Cheers,
Daniel
pgpIYxDa5F1Qp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:35:16PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
I'd say tablets and touch screens should report raw device coordinates
and let the X server transform them as appropriate. It'd be really cool
if we could make all absolute devices report position in floating point
using a
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:14:31PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 07 December 2009, tsuraan wrote:
These drivers sound seriously
unloved.
Yes, for the rv610 based cards in particular. The guys have seemingly danced
all the way around it like its a pile of smelly poo. Heck, Alex
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:25:08AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:22AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
If you don't want a session manager or you prefer a different desktop
environment - you're on your own.
Let me remind you that GNOME is not an
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:07:50PM +0100, Yann Droneaud wrote:
Did you know you're writing to a public mailing list ? So the content of
your mail is not going to be confidential and disclosure,
distribution [and] copying is going to happen. In fact is already
happened.
This message is
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:21:28AM +0300, Charmaine Brugnoli wrote:
[spam]
So sorry about this. I've unsubscribed them now. Grr.
pgpvcOZ3k9GK2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:04:58PM +0800, yakui.z...@intel.com wrote:
Move the EDID quirk for Philips LCD LP154W01 as the panel reports the vertical
size in cm.
Err, I think it's safe to say that this was seen the first seven times
it was posted ...
Cheers,
Daniel
pgpQwltQFkN0K.pgp
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:52:13AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
I don't know how many features evtouch provides aside from dejittering and
the right-click emulation (both of which would be perfectly appropriate for
evdev btw).
You don't think dejittering is more appropriate for the kernel?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:28:44PM -0600, Scott Sibley wrote:
Hello. I'm writing an LCD controller, and one feature I'd like is the
ability to interact with an LCD via the keyboard. I have the following code,
but only the FocusOut/FocusIn events are firing.
Either there's a passive grab, or
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:01:13PM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2009 12:25:43 Jorge Hernandez wrote:
Is there any documentation that describes how to install x.org on a Free
BSD system? I downloaded all the source files but I don't know what to do
with them.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:58PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
(xkbproto isn't yet, but I'm leaving that for Daniel to decide if
the changes sitting in git are ready to go and should be included
in 7.5 or wait until later.)
All I'm seeing in master since 1.0.3 is a change from #defines to
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:13:57AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 03 October 2009, Mark Kettenis wrote:
I still use xinit/startx to start X, and very much *do* consider it to
be an essential part of X.
+1000, Amen and hip hip hooray. I have never started X any other way, and
Hi all,
Cutting and pasting from my blog entry[0] because I'm lazy:
As ajax quite elegantly summed up[1], due to a series of catastrophic
power failures at PSU, where fd.o is hosted, we were down for a good
chunk of yesterday. Despite the machines having redundant power
supplies, being
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:59:24AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
The fix I proposed doesn't solve the case where DGA is initialized
twice, once by the driver and once by the DiDGA layer. Here's a
version which has the DiDGA code override the driver DGA
initialization.
You don't want to just
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:41:42AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
Excerpts from Daniel Stone's message of Tue Sep 29 11:23:33 -0700 2009:
You don't want to just no-op DGAInit?
And have the DiDGA layer call some other 'real' DGAInit function?
Well, if the objective is to never have the driver
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:15:08AM +, Nokan Emiro wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Nokan Emiro wrote:
How can I change the XkbSelectEvents's parameters to be messaged on all
keypresses?
I'm not an X programmer, but doesn't xev do this
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:08:59PM +0530, Venkateswara_Chalamalasetti wrote:
Recently i have started using Xming free software to connect to one Solaris
machine. It works. But i have a question in my mind. Is it possible to
install Xming on WTS and publish Xming on Citrix web page? So that
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:53:30PM +0200, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
since some time, XkbSetDetectableAutoRepeat is broken.
XkbSetDetectableAutoRepeat works by filtering in XkbFilterEvent all
events that are equal to the previously stored XkbLastRepeatEvent(in
AccessXKeyboardEvent). This is
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:14:17AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:13:15PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:17:15PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
VT switching only works as long as the grab is asynchronous, otherwise
events are queued up
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:17:15PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:56:58AM +1000, David Campbell wrote:
By switching to a VT, did you mean pressing CTRL-ALT-number to
switch to a virtual terminal?
That doesn't work for me, due to the grab. Pressing those
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 03:46:12AM +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
I personally wouldn't mind a kill all grabs button/key/whatever. Even
if you can debug a grab issue, you don't always have the time or the
right machine (debugging symbols and friends) to do it.
Yeah, it will come back as an XKB
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:58:44AM +, Francesco Pretto wrote:
I'm sorry, but this not a very useful answer. You are basically saying the
driver loading priority of Xorg is hardcoded and if you want to change it,
recompile Xserver. I've already read that discussions in the past: I DON'T
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 03:24:27PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Kevin Stange at 12/05/09 18:23 did gyre and gimble:
So you're saying this HAL method is widely (or
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:55:05AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 03:24:27PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:33:29AM +0200, Gregory Smirnov wrote:
2009/5/4 Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Your program has always been broken then - X keycodes are different
on different platforms and servers, and as kbd/evdev show, sometimes
even different drivers on the same
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:01:25PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote:
Specifically, when X started I had no keyboard or mouse. After
power-cycling [no other way to escape!] I found a message in the log
saying that AllowEmptyInput was enabled and that my keyboard and
mouse configuration was
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20:59AM +0200, VARADHARAJAN RAVINDRANATH wrote:
I am a newbie in Xorg. I have a requirement wherein I need to grab
the key events in my X11 application even though it does not have focus.
This application in turn will do some manipulation in the received key
and
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:14:21AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Bill Crawford wrote:
It makes perfect sense. He's saying that (f(A) ⊢ g(B)) ⊬ (¬f(A) ⊢ ¬g(B)),
where
A is release, f is latest, B is API and g is stable ;o)
The point is not that it has to be the latest
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:16:49AM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
On 2009-04-07, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
xmodmap should work fine these days: if it doesn't, file an actual bug
^^
on http
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:07:07PM +, tv wrote:
It's so wonderful when essential features like saveunders are removed.
Now you'll get hordes of people complaining and thinking your software
is buggy because applications are constantly redrawing under it... when
the assholes in power
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:54:06PM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:36:13PM +0200, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
I agree with you. If you're too lazy and do not have enough dedication
to create an account on our bugzilla to file a proper bug report,
you're probably
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:52:12PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:34:48PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 04/08/2009 05:24 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
If only the latest release is API-stable, by definition it's not
stable.
This cannot be deduced from that line.
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:27:37AM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
The only problem with core fonts is the blur-fascist elite
not bothering to fix UTF-8 fontset support, so there you have
some problems.
I don't think I ever saw any patches.
But don't mind me, the last person who wants good
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:01:42PM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
that need root access to modify.
That or an ability to read documentation.
(Nobody ever does anything new properly, just adds layers upon
layers of indirection, complexity upon complexity. Latest example
being the kernel-level
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:39:59PM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
On 2009-04-07, Corbin Simpson mostawesomed...@gmail.com wrote:
Pollute my system with KDE or Gnome? Rather install Windows.
Sounds like a plan. Enjoy your Cleartype.
Plan executed and succesfully accomplished. Byebye Linux.
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:36:18PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
the first one says that LBX is deprecated. however, has any
replacement for LBX been written _before_ deprecating it? has any
replacement been considered?
Yes -- SSH.
the second one says xproxymngproto is no
points, the next-highest three points, and so forth.
The nominees elected by the Membership to serve a two-year term on the
X.Org Foundation Board are as follows:
Alan Coopersmith (112 points)
Bart Massey (89 points)
Daniel Stone (77 points)
Donnie Berkholz (71 points
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:52:44PM +0530, Mustafizur Rahaman wrote:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
html
Hi,
Please only send plain-text email to the list.
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:48:08AM +0100, Marc Weber wrote:
This last one isn't. It looks like some other output has been passed to args?
I don't understand yet what is happening here (between args and exit
code there should only be the expansion of $@.. But there is also an
error
Hi,
I was going to reply to the original, but Peter's reply says pretty much
everything I wanted to say.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:29:42AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:28:23PM -0500, Jim Gettys wrote:
Here are some substantive issues:
1) I wonder how we can
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:22:43AM -0800, milnser43...@yahoo.com wrote:
What is the rationale behind removing the xtrap extension. [...]
Some people (including some of my friends) have a problem where there's
effectively no filter between their brain and their mouth, and they just
say whatever
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 06:50:38AM -0800, milnser43...@yahoo.com wrote:
I dont think that backwards compatability code should be removed just
because we dont dont think anyone uses it anymore, or because we can. As
far as I am aware these extensions were not causing any problems and I cannot
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:47:48PM -0500, Jim Gettys wrote:
It would be good if the xorg-devel list appeared on the mail list list
at: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/
This is a checkbox in mailman; of course, with mailman, it can often be
a maze of little passages, all
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:32:57AM +0100, Rene Rebe wrote:
On 12.02.2009, at 09:59, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 12/02/2009 09:38, Rene Rebe a écrit :
Even more annoying is that the kdrive xvesa was deleted from
the xorg-server git repository some weeks ago!
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:58:52PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:51:46PM -0500, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Thanks a lot. It seems that the use of xmodmap is actually deprecated,
is it?
Looking back at the previous mailing discussion, deprecated is probably
the wrong
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:01:43PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:58:52PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:51:46PM -0500, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Thanks a lot. It seems that the use of xmodmap is actually
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
