On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote:
Hi all,
Here's another issue with DRI2/UXA on intel that I can't gather enough
information about for a fruitful bug report. So, I'll ask the list if
this issue is known.
I'm on the latest released stack (libdrm 2.4.4, mesa 7.3, xserver
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote:
I'm a bit tied up in real life right now, but if no has beaten me to
it, I'll file a bug as soon as I find the time. Problem is, though, I
can't find any useful debugging information to go with the bug report.
I've filed it as
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:21, Albert Vilella avile...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
What is the current support and roadmap for discrete graphics card hot
switching in Xorg?
There is no support, and AFAIK no roadmap either. There are many
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, frankdelange wrote:
From: Frank de Lange freedeskto...@unternet.org
I don't have a VIA-equipped machine so I can not test this patch but given
that
VIA and Savage are 'quite similar' this should work to fix the segfault on
start caused by use of an unallocated
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Scott Serr wrote:
I'm using Ubuntu 8.10 / Intrepid. I'm working on a multiseat project,
but this is not a multiseat issue.
I disable HAL, to let X handle the input devices:
Section ServerFlags
Option AutoAddDevices false
EndSection
Then specify my keyboard:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
I don't know if you guys have seen this yet, but Phoronix did an
evaluation of the more recent Intel changes, and it was less than
favorable:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=intel_graphics_q408num=1
They probably hit the no
Hi
Just wanted to raise the awareness of this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19048
which is the only one keeping me from uploading it to the ubuntu devel
release before alpha2 next week ;)
t
___
xorg mailing list
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Config.c |5 +++--
hw/xfree86/doc/man/xorg.conf.man.pre |2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Config.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Config.c
index a6290a7..b05b283 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Config.c
Hi
I've now even tested the patch against 1.5.3, and it works like a charm.
Ok to commit? The rationale is pretty clear I think. Some distributions
might have used 'vmmouse' instead of 'mouse' by default, and those who
upgrade to a newer release could get upset when they can't
