On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:11:02AM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > > Yes, the original patch as posted was buggy. > > > > I've now pushed an improved version out to the master branch that should > > not have this bug. > > > > Any feedback on that would be most welcome.
Well, with UXA I can get 215000 glyphs/sec *without* the glyph cache in the Xserver. With EXA I got only 66000 glyphs/sec. Is there something terribly broken in Intel's EXA code or Xserver's EXA? I use Xserver 1.5.3 (from Ubuntu). I run both UXA and EXA on the same Xserver. -- Lukáš Hejtmánek _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
