Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:08:54 +0200
> Simon Thum wrote:
>> There is a distinct advantage the server has, namely, it knows more
>> detail. So it could do a better job than a client/wm. But still that's
>> far from perfect, which I guess is why reading tea leaves has been
>>
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:08:54 +0200
Simon Thum wrote:
> Harald Braumann wrote:
> > If it's not possible yet, are there plans to implement such
> > functionality in the X server? Like sending an event whenever the
> > pointer stops?
> Well, X is in pretty much the same situation here; it just knows
Harald Braumann wrote:
> If it's not possible yet, are there plans to implement such
> functionality in the X server? Like sending an event whenever the
> pointer stops?
Well, X is in pretty much the same situation here; it just knows when
the mouse moves, or when it did so last time (plus somethin
Hi,
if focus follows mouse is used, all window managers I know of have a
serious usability problem: a window is focused as soon as it is
entered. Even if the pointer is just passes a window while moved
between two other windows.. In this case I would expect
no focus change. The window should be fo
