Luc Verhaegen wrote:
members@ is basically a dead list, except around elections. I personally
am all for re-using it. Also, an archive of the ml would be handy too.
There is an archive, it's just hard to find due to the way the X.Org mailing
lists are currently hosted:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:35:08AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Luc Verhaegen wrote:
members@ is basically a dead list, except around elections. I personally
am all for re-using it. Also, an archive of the ml would be handy too.
There is an archive, it's just hard to find due to the way
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:08:35AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:35:08AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Luc Verhaegen wrote:
members@ is basically a dead list, except around elections. I personally
am all for re-using it. Also, an archive of the ml would be handy
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:59:23PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
One of the things complained about in the election (and most past
elections, including ones where I complained) was that the communication
between the board and members tends to happen once a year at election
time, and that
