Twas brillig at 06:49:01 11.08.2010 UTC+02 when
curi...@bwv190.internetdsl.tpnet.pl did gyre and gimble:
PGS i also recall long gone times when i could build 3.3.6 XFree which
PGS would run on 486 with 8M of ram , and squash the (static!) binary
PGS to just 2M. perhaps with uclibc this could be
and NAND is 32M.
-Original Message-
From: Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski [mailto:curi...@bwv190.internetdsl.tpnet.pl]
Sent: Wednesday, 11. August 2010 11:43 AM
To: Mikhail Gusarov
Cc: Mart Raudsepp; Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1); xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: X lib support for embedded systems
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1)
praveen...@in.bosch.com wrote:
Hello there.
I am developing graphics system to one of our touch screen keypad.
I planned to use fltk-2.0 to achieve the same.
For this I required X11. But as the X11 is very huge, I wanted a slimmed
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Siji Sunny sijisu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1)
praveen...@in.bosch.com wrote:
Hello there.
I am developing graphics system to one of our touch screen keypad.
I planned to use fltk-2.0 to achieve the same.
Twas brillig at 08:13:29 11.08.2010 UTC+02 when
curi...@bwv190.internetdsl.tpnet.pl did gyre and gimble:
PGS what facts do you need ? try tools like qpkg, ls -lha and
PGS calculator on your own systems.
Desktop X.org? Are you joking?
PGS also try to run Xorg on anything with 32/64M ram
PGS
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 08:13:29 11.08.2010 UTC+02 when
curi...@bwv190.internetdsl.tpnet.pl did gyre and gimble:
PGS what facts do you need ? try tools like qpkg, ls -lha and
PGS calculator on your own systems.
Desktop X.org? Are you joking?
is there any
Twas brillig at 08:54:20 11.08.2010 UTC+02 when
curi...@bwv190.internetdsl.tpnet.pl did gyre and gimble:
PGS well, it all depends what u call 'fine'
PGS if it's 'managed to boot up, took half of memory and runs @ 5fps'
PGS then sure ;)
PGS btw quick mem check on one of my uclibc based
.
Do you follow?
From: Siji Sunny [mailto:sijisu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 11. August 2010 12:17 PM
To: Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1)
Cc: xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: X lib support for embedded systems.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Praveen J C (RBEI
Ok its like this:
Our application was developed using fltk-1.3.x. We have lots of existing code
that depends on fltk.
But the person who decided to use fltk-1.3 was really a moron.
Because, fltk-1.3 was modified by nano-X people to use nxlib interfaces, and
all to test the nano-X (x server
@lists.freedesktop.org
*Subject:* Re: X lib support for embedded systems.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1)
praveen...@in.bosch.com wrote:
Hello there.
I am developing graphics system to one of our touch screen keypad.
I planned to use fltk-2.0 to achieve the same
@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: X lib support for embedded systems.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1)
praveen...@in.bosch.commailto:praveen...@in.bosch.com wrote:
Ok its like this:
Our application was developed using fltk-1.3.x. We have lots of existing code
that depends on fltk
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1) wrote:
OOPS.. I forgot to mention that i must be using linux OS.
Also I came across kdrive.. but they its obsolete? is it true?
personally i do not see much point or advantage over directfb,
as most cards do not get acceleration with kdrive and
@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: X lib support for embedded systems.
Ok its like this:
Our application was developed using fltk-1.3.x. We have lots of existing code
that depends on fltk.
But the person who decided to use fltk-1.3 was really a moron.
Because, fltk-1.3 was modified by nano-X people to use
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 06:49:01AM +0200, ext Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
http://83.18.229.190/minimalistix_linux/static-binaries/XF86_SVGA
this one is static binary which is pretty old and has ~4M footprint, and
since then i
could not build either anything smaller, or anything which
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:19:55AM +0200, ext Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1) wrote:
Also I came across kdrive.. but they its obsolete? is it true?
yes, in short kdrive hardware servers are obsolete.
Tiago
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:59:32PM +0200, ext Praveen J C (RBEI/EST1) wrote:
Basically X11 and fltk must occupy not more than 20MB!
I found interesting that your biggest concern here is storage. That's _really_
cheap nowadays!
Tiago
___
Hello there.
I am developing graphics system to one of our touch screen keypad.
I planned to use fltk-2.0 to achieve the same.
For this I required X11. But as the X11 is very huge, I wanted a slimmed down
version of the same.
Basically X11 and fltk must occupy not more than 20MB!
Fltk basically
Hello there.
I am developing graphics system to one of our touch screen keypad.
I planned to use fltk-2.0 to achieve the same.
For this I required X11. But as the X11 is very huge, I wanted a slimmed down
version of the same.
Basically X11 and fltk must occupy not more than 20MB!
Fltk
On T, 2010-08-10 at 16:15 +0200, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
Hello there.
I am developing graphics system to one of our touch screen keypad.
I planned to use fltk-2.0 to achieve the same.
For this I required X11. But as the X11 is very huge, I wanted a slimmed
down version of the
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On T, 2010-08-10 at 16:15 +0200, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
Hello there.
I am developing graphics system to one of our touch screen keypad.
I planned to use fltk-2.0 to achieve the same.
For this I required X11. But as the X11 is very huge, I
Twas brillig at 06:49:01 11.08.2010 UTC+02 when
curi...@bwv190.internetdsl.tpnet.pl did gyre and gimble:
PGS i also recall long gone times when i could build 3.3.6 XFree which
PGS would run on 486 with 8M of ram , and squash the (static!) binary
PGS to just 2M. perhaps with uclibc this could
21 matches
Mail list logo
