On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:45 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Could do either one as a first pass, I suppose.
I'd suggest doing a DIX-level implementation today and working out
driver hooks later on then.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 09:25 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 10:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > I think it's most natural to do this as additional border fields in a
> > MODEINFO. Imagine a new definition:
>
> I'd say adding a new border size and color request would be eas
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 09:27 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:55 +0100, Éric Piel wrote:
> > Keith Packard schreef:
> > > On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 14:42 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > >> Can we define what RANDR 1.3 means? I think we're largely in agreement
> > >>
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:55 +0100, Éric Piel wrote:
> Keith Packard schreef:
> > On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 14:42 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >> Can we define what RANDR 1.3 means? I think we're largely in agreement
> >> but I'd like it written down.
> >
> > I think RandR 1.3 includes:
>
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 10:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I think it's most natural to do this as additional border fields in a
> MODEINFO. Imagine a new definition:
I'd say adding a new border size and color request would be easier;
you'd set the pending border size/color and then set the mode,
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 16:25 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 18:23 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > Overscan correction? I don't think this counts as a subset of
> > projective transforms, but I could be wrong.
>
> No, not a part of projective transforms as it doesn't change t
Keith Packard schreef:
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 14:42 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
Hello,
>> Can we define what RANDR 1.3 means? I think we're largely in agreement
>> but I'd like it written down.
>
> I think RandR 1.3 includes:
>
> 1. Projective transforms
> 2. Standard properties
> 3. Per-CRT
> On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 15:57 -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>> > I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
>> > for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
>> > include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to know how much of the
>>
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 18:23 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Overscan correction? I don't think this counts as a subset of
> projective transforms, but I could be wrong.
No, not a part of projective transforms as it doesn't change the
pixel->pixel mapping.
It sounds useful; get some code together a
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 14:36 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 14:42 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 13:13 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> > > for the end of the year (yes, this year, 20
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 14:42 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 13:13 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> > for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
> > include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I
Adam Jackson wrote:
> There is still one major bugfix that was only ever applied to 1.5 branch
> and not master:
>
> commit 7822a3d05f935cca3bfa47d15d961596652ecfca
> Author: Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue Jun 17 16:10:51 2008 -0400
>
> XAA: Disable offscreen pixmaps by default
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 13:13 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
> include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to know how much of the new
> Xinput stuff will be read
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 15:57 -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> > I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> > for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
> > include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to know how much of the new
> >
On Nov 17, 08 09:21:55 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > I'm unsure whether it would be wise to include panning support in 1.3,
> > even given that I manage to put it together until 11/24. I guess it
> > should settle in master first.
> I'd like to get panning into 1.6; it's not a huge driver change
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 13:08 +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:
> Keith, AFAICS the standard properties do not inflict any changes on
> server code except for the naming of the EDID data property, so I assume
> that's fine here.
Yup.
> I'm unsure whether it would be wise to include panning support in 1.
On Nov 14, 08 13:13:16 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
> include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to know how much of the new
> Xinput stuff will be ready in
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:13:16PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
> include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to know how much of the new
> Xinput stuff will
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 14:03 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> 1.6_beta1: 11/24
> 1.6_beta2: 12/08
> 1.6_rc1: 12/22
> 1.6_rc2: 12/29
> 1.6: 01/05
Sounds good to me.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
Le 16/11/2008 02:43, Keith Packard a écrit :
> Anything on master is going into 1.6, unless we find regressions.
Reading your mail, I was under the impression you'd be starting a 1.6
branch on top of 1.5 and then cherry-picking DRI2 and RR1.3 patches on
top of it.
I'm glad to hear you'll be usi
On Nov 14, 2008, at 14:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 13:13 Fri 14 Nov , Keith Packard wrote:
Here's a proposed schedule of events:
Cut a release branch, do a -RC1 release:11/24
Track remaining work on scheduled features,
cherry-picking commits from master. Cut -RC212/8
Stop
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 09:34 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 14/11/2008 22:13, Keith Packard a écrit :
> > I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> > for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
> > include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to
> I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
> include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to know how much of the new
> Xinput stuff will be ready in time.
Hi Keith,
First, thanks for doing it.
Le 14/11/2008 22:13, Keith Packard a écrit :
> I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
> for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
> include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to know how much of the new
> Xinput stuff will be ready in time.
On 13:13 Fri 14 Nov , Keith Packard wrote:
> Here's a proposed schedule of events:
>
> Cut a release branch, do a -RC1 release: 11/24
>
> Track remaining work on scheduled features,
> cherry-picking commits from master. Cut -RC2 12/8
>
> Stop accepting new code, focus on bug fixing.
>
I volunteered to manage an X server 1.6 release, tentatively scheduled
for the end of the year (yes, this year, 2008). This release will
include DRI2 and RandR 1.3 support. I'd like to know how much of the new
Xinput stuff will be ready in time.
Here's a proposed schedule of events:
Cut a release
26 matches
Mail list logo
