Re: liblbxutil broken?

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:36:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: In 57d09e47d05fce0d6df4060b2eff9a8efcc25b2f you have removed lbxzlib.h from the xextproto sources. However, liblbxutil does still reference this header file (1.0.1 as well as git head). Is there some new dependency, or is

Re: liblbxutil broken?

2009-08-10 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:08 +0200, walter harms wrote: Julien Cristau schrieb: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:04:06 +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: Hi Adam, In 57d09e47d05fce0d6df4060b2eff9a8efcc25b2f you have removed lbxzlib.h from the xextproto sources. However, liblbxutil does still

Re: liblbxutil broken?

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:33:49AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:08 +0200, walter harms wrote: Julien Cristau schrieb: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:04:06 +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: Hi Adam, In 57d09e47d05fce0d6df4060b2eff9a8efcc25b2f you have removed lbxzlib.h

Re: liblbxutil broken?

2009-08-10 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:53 +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:33:49AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:08 +0200, walter harms wrote: Julien Cristau schrieb: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:04:06 +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: Hi Adam, In