Hello.
I'm attempting a build of Xorg 7.4. I've Google'd my way through
building Mesa-7.2 and several other places where my build stopped.
I've run into an error building xorg-input-evdev-2.0.6 and I'm not
able to find any productive information about it.
I have Slackware 11.0, gcc-3.4.6, and I'm
I am active user of X.org and I admire the power and features that X.org
provides to the users. I regularly use exported display over an ssh session and
operate. I commend the developers for such a wonder piece of software. However,
I would like to know one thing as described below.
Consider a
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:04:58PM +1100, William Grant wrote:
> TRUE was not replaced with Success when all of the other property
> handler return codes were. This meant that properties ended up set in
> the driver but not the rest of the server.
Pushed as db6e631d31d4ffd476ccd105f8adb8d8b4727b29
Adam Jackson (6):
int10: Remove useless check.
int10: Don't warn when scanning for devices we don't have.
int10: Fix a nasty memory leak.
Revert "Array-index based devPrivates implementation."
EDID: Catch monitors that encode aspect ratio for physical size.
xserv
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Yeah, that sounds like something I'd say. I am not the release bitch
> for 1.6 though. No strong feelings either way on the ABI number,
> personally.
I'm doing 1.6, and I don't care about ABI numbers either; the only rule
we should make i
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:56 -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:34:49PM +1030, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > ABI_XINPUT_VERSION was bumped with the MPX merge, thus 3 is already the
> > correct version (server 1.5 has 2, btw.) Should we revert part of this
> > patch?
>
> Sorry ab
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 22:52 -0700, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.c b/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.c
> index 0d86776..ad8feef 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.c
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.c
> @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ xf86DoEEDID(int scrnIndex, I2CBusPtr pBus, Bool complete)
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:34:49PM +1030, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Apologies for not spotting this earlier.
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:51:56AM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> > commit 079625570d51e41569b73b2fd9237eb8f967f408
> > Author: Aaron Plattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon Sep 8 08
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:00:10PM +0200, Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
> >> Lately it came up for discussion on the Neo-Layout mailing list, if
> >> maybe Neo could be a separate keyboard layout, which mi
Hi,
sorry for the late answer.
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
> Sergey is the maintainer of the XKB dataset, but I think I can answer
> most of these (again), so.
>
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
>> Lately it came up for discussion on the Neo-Layout mailing list,
TRUE was not replaced with Success when all of the other property
handler return codes were. This meant that properties ended up set in
the driver but not the rest of the server.
---
src/properties.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/properties.c b/src/p
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> something like
>
> --
> RegisterHandler(myHandler, HEAD);
> RegisterHandler(otherHandler, TAIL);
>
> void myHandler(foo) {
>
>CallNextHandler(); /* causes otherHandler to be called */
>return PROP_HANDLED;
> }
> --
>
> Where CallNextHandler calls the handler next
12 matches
Mail list logo
