Pedro Izecksohn wrote:
On 2/24/09, Simon Thum simon.t...@gmx.de wrote:
Pedro Izecksohn wrote:
Where it may be found?
Nowhere, AFAIK.
You may want to know this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158476
First off, you need to use reply-all. It's an incident I saw this.
Let see if I
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:11:06 Alex Bennee wrote:
2009/2/25 Alex Bennee kernel-hac...@bennee.com:
X Log attached.
More detailed log with debug turned on.
I'm pretty sure that with xorg-server-1.5.3 you should use EXA instead of UXA,
because UXA works with DRI2, and your xorg-server
Peter Hutterer wrote:
XML is merely a container format. It doesn't solve our actual problem - what
information to send to the client.
[...]
We're in pretty unchartered territory, with much of the UI needing to change
anyway to accommodate for all this. Once the UI changes, the information need
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series.
The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS
that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more
stable than
Eric Anholt pisze:
Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series.
The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS
that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more
stable than previously. Notable fixes include a significant BO
Hi,
I want to use an Xfbdev server on an embedded board. I have
cross-compiled it along with the needed libraries, and I can start it, I
can run my application upon it, but I have some problems. I start Xfbdev
as follows:
Xfbdev -br -mouse tslib,,device=/dev/input/event1 -keybd keyboard -fp
Vasily Khoruzhick pisze:
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:10:47 Jacek Luczak wrote:
Hi Eric,
this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of
memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported earlier, ,,memory
leak''? As a result X are really slow and lot of lockups
Benjamin Close wrote:
The following patches fix compilation under FreeBSD. The gallium commit
forgot about the other operating systems that are out there. These
patches allow successful compilation.
Thanks. Committed.
BTW, in the future please post Mesa patches to the mesa3d-dev list.
Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:10:47 Jacek Luczak wrote:
this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of
memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported earlier, ,,memory
leak''? As a result X are really slow and lot of lockups occur
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Benjamin Close
benjamin.cl...@clearchain.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Close benjamin.cl...@clearchain.com
---
src/egl/main/Makefile | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/egl/main/Makefile b/src/egl/main/Makefile
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Benjamin Close
benjamin.cl...@clearchain.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Close benjamin.cl...@clearchain.com
---
src/egl/main/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/egl/main/Makefile
Hopefully the last before (maybe equivalent except version number)
before 1.3...
Changes since 1.2.99.3:
Adam Jackson (1):
Zero reply from GetPanning means panning not supported.
Maarten Maathuis (1):
Fix typo in 83f3f29dd3ac5d3875b5edef5805d6adb6a02698.
Matthias Hopf (4):
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
On Feb 18, 09 21:09:54 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 18:11 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Is randrproto going to be stabilized before 1.6 is pushed out? It
seems odd to have the final 1.6 server depend on an rc of the protocol
headers. It seems obvious to me, but
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 14:10:47 Jacek Luczak wrote:
Eric Anholt pisze:
Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series.
The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS
that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 13:20 +0100, Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series.
The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS
that we think
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:10 +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
Eric Anholt pisze:
Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series.
The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS
that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more
Eric Anholt wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 14:10 +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
this release is totally unusable while running in UXA. System eats lot of
memory, including swapping. Is this that, reported earlier, ,,memory leak''?
As
a result X are really slow and lot of lockups occur (everything
-Original Message-
From: Jim Gettys [mailto:j...@freedesktop.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:47 AM
To: McDonald, Michael-p7438c
Cc: Pat Kane; xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: Ximage's byte_order field
You should be able to specify your byte order of the local
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 11:54 -0700, McDonald, Michael-p7438c wrote:
No problem. I was just trying to make sure you had intended the
byte_order field to be user accessable. Since the Ximage structure was
defined, I had assumed yes.
Yes, though that was not really the original intent; the
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Gilad Arnold arn...@cs.berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi,
I've been running Xorg with Gentoo Linux on my T40/T41 for a while now.
In the past I was able to use my DVI monitor to its full 1920x1200
resolution with hardware acceleration using the open-source radeon
driver
Alex, thanks for the quick reply.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:55:49PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
Sounds like display underflow.
I wonder what that is and what causes it?
Try disabling the LVDS if you aren't using it.
I tried adding this to xorg.conf:
Section Monitor
Identifier LVDS
I'm getting all white blocks instead of transparencies using this driver
with DRI2/UXA in compiz. Think I was getting this with previous 2.6.x
drivers too.
xf86-video-intel-2.6.2
libdrm- (2/24/09)
Xorg-server-1.5.99.902
compiz-0.7.8
G45/X4500HD
EXA works ok though, uses a lot of memory
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Gilad Arnold arn...@cs.berkeley.edu wrote:
Alex, thanks for the quick reply.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:55:49PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
Sounds like display underflow.
I wonder what that is and what causes it?
Not enough memory bandwidth for everything you
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:32:58PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
Also, IIRC, the DVI port on the IBM docking station is only supposed
to support a max resolution of 1280x1204 or 1600x1200. It might be a
limitation of DVI traces or connector in the docking station.
I'm not sure. As I said, the
Also, let me know if you'd like to see my xorg.conf or log file. Many
thanks for your help so far.
Gilad
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:56:56PM -0800, Gilad Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:32:58PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
Also, IIRC, the DVI port on the IBM docking station is only
libXi 1.2.1.
Fixes a potential memory overflow in XGetDeviceControl.
Alan Coopersmith (1):
Add README with pointers to mailing list, bugzilla git repos
Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade (1):
Return NULL on error, and match LockDisplay with UnlockDisplay.
Peter Hutterer (3):
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:50:30AM +0200, Jin, Gordon wrote:
You need an alsa patch. You can try the one against 2.6.28 on
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2008Q4.html. I'm not sure if the code
has gone into current Linus tree.
Hi Richard,
The ASLA driver for Intel HDMI audio is now in
Le 24/02/2009 23:46, Eric Anholt a écrit :
Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series.
In my limited testing, here's what I have so far :
- 2.6.28 + EXA : works fine, seems to have actually solved a few 855
specific bugs, fencing maybe?
- 2.6.28 + UXA : Acid Mode
29 matches
Mail list logo
