Am 17 Feb 2010 12:38:16, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com schrieb:
And aside from that, didn't you say earlier that the Intel
driver actually has it removed and that it is official Xorg
policy that keeping classic dual-screen alive is not intended?
Yes, the intel driver has removed it.
Eeri Kask eeri.k...@inf.tu-dresden.de writes:
Am 17 Feb 2010 12:38:16, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com schrieb:
And aside from that, didn't you say earlier that the Intel
driver actually has it removed and that it is official Xorg
policy that keeping classic dual-screen alive is not
Since voting is officially ending today I have cast my votes just now...
but i did not at all feel comfortable doing so.
While we did start to get some insights in the Boards doings of the past
year, these insights are very limited indeed.
There are no transcripts nor minutes of meetings. Irc
Eeri Kask wrote:
Am 17 Feb 2010 12:38:16, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com schrieb:
And aside from that, didn't you say earlier that the Intel
driver actually has it removed and that it is official Xorg
policy that keeping classic dual-screen alive is not intended?
Yes, the intel driver
I am not a member, which says something already. But in short
everything surrounding the board has never tempted to sign up or vote.
Apart from hosting a few servers i never knew what they were doing.
This situation has somewhat improved but it's still vague. At the
moment i still do not feel the
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:10:52PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Aside from that, it's not actually the popup window that's the issue it's
the active grab.
These grabs are a PITA anyway, even when not using MPX. Once you've opened
a menu or a drop-down list, you can't do anything else. Can't
Right. I am the outsider who will find out what is going on in there
and share that info with you the voter. If it is not too late, ...
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not a member, which says something already. But in short
everything
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:44, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
Since voting is officially ending today I have cast my votes just now...
but i did not at all feel comfortable doing so.
While we did start to get some insights in the Boards doings of the past
year, these insights are very
Sorry Daniel,
It's the Board's responsibility, and within the Board that of the Treasurer
who is responsible for representing to the Board the current financial
position of X.Org.
If it was successful, value received for money spent, you deserve credit for
proposing it. If it was financially
I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
../doltcompile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../include -I../hw/xfree86/os-support -I../hw/xfree86/os-support/bus
-I../hw/xfree86/common -I../hw/xfree86/dri -I../mi
-I../hw/xfree86/dri2
Quick list: x12, shatter, 3d for the Big Three, million char/s for Big
Three, multigpu xrandr, move some drivers back in. I think that's the bulk
of what we've talked about.
Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Feb 18, 2010 2:21 PM, Peter Winston pe...@ics.com wrote:
The thing
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk wrote:
I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
../doltcompile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../include -I../hw/xfree86/os-support
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
$US24k for travel sponsorship (no joke), and something like $US5k lost
to PayPal (they
On 18 February 2010 22:46, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk wrote:
I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
../doltcompile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk wrote:
On 18 February 2010 22:46, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk wrote:
I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
xorg-server master isn't compiling I
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:50:40PM -0800, Corbin Simpson wrote:
On Feb 18, 2010 2:21 PM, Peter Winston pe...@ics.com wrote:
The thing that suprises me is that there has been no discussion of
how do we update the vision and goals of x.org
The fact that we might be spending too much for
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Egbert Eich e...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
$US24k for
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
$US24k for travel
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:59, Peter Winston pe...@ics.com wrote:
The thing that suprises me is that there has been no discussion of how do
we update the vision and goals of x.org
The fact that we might be spending too much for hosting, or doing a poor job
of accounting for expences is
On 18 February 2010 23:11, Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk wrote:
I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
xorg-server master isn't compiling I get the error:
../doltcompile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
On 18 February 2010 23:19, Alexander Lam lambchop...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk wrote:
I'm experiencing 3 issues at the moment
[snip]
And lastly the latest intel DRM code from drm-intel-next has the
following issue too:
CC
On 18 February 2010 22:58, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk wrote:
On 18 February 2010 22:46, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk wrote:
I'm
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:18:47PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
I'm pretty uncomfortable with the suggestion here. No, wait, very
uncomfortable. (Not to mention that if any misuse of funds _did_ go on
here, then it sucks to be me, because if that was the case, then I got
not a single cent from
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:18:47PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:45:07PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
escape the office early), XDS
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:45, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:33:36PM -0800, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:44, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
There is little to no information about the X.org Foundation Boards
financial
Hi Guys,
In meat space, I've now had 2 people telling me that they've voted
in a certain way because they are really concerned about the missing
money. This is a very high figure, given that I'm a nobody and I
don't even know any current X developers in person!
Reading this thread, I'm not
Am 02/18/2010 03:57 PM, Alan Coopersmith schrieb:
or (3) have paying customers who want it to be supported, so it's
worth them spending the time needed on it? (I have no knowledge
of whether that's the case or not, it just seems like an obvious
possibility that you overlooked, since Nvidia
27 matches
Mail list logo
