This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I hope to do on
Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into build issues,
etc.
Looks like we won't get *all* the blockers fixed, but I think we did pretty
well.
Changelog from 2.4.97 below.
Thanks,
Jesse
Adam
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:41:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw building the libdrm 2.4.0 tarball (or the git master) still gives
libdrm.so.2.3.0
Probably, line 25 of libdrm/Makefile.am:
libdrm_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 2:3:0 -no-undefined
should have been changed to:
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 02:06 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
The soversion is not a package release version.
pkg-config --version libdrm
But that pkg-config lays a trap for you here. The usage above gives you
the version of pkg-config itself, (something like 0.22 or whatever). To
instead get the
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 15:55 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:48 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
Hi ,
Since xf86-video-intel 2.5 needs libdrm 2.4.0 , we need Mesa 7.2 ?
or is enough ? just upgrade libdrm , and compile xf86-video-intel 2.5
for xserver 1.4.2
Eric Anholt wrote:
I couldn't find any clearer release process for it than tag it and dump
a tarball into this directory -- if any other DRM maintainer-types want
to suggest an appropriate process, I'd love to hear.
With 2.3.1 an announce was sent to xorg-announce. Seeing as this affects
xorg
Hi ,
Since xf86-video-intel 2.5 needs libdrm 2.4.0 , we need Mesa 7.2 ?
or is enough ? just upgrade libdrm , and compile xf86-video-intel 2.5
for xserver 1.4.2
Thanks,
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 12:16 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 20:50 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jesse
On Sunday, October 19, 2008 11:50 am Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I hope to
do on Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into build
issues, etc.
configure wants libdrm 2.4.0 which has yet to be
On Sunday, October 19, 2008 12:16 pm Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 20:50 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I hope to
do on Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into
build
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
And if I start a GEM kernel, X doesn't even start. See my previous post
on intel-gfx.
This is the failed to pin back buffer error?
I would say yes. dmesg says :
[drm:i915_gem_object_bind_to_gtt] *ERROR* GTT full, but LRU list empty
[drm:i915_gem_object_pin] *ERROR*
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 00:11 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
And if I start a GEM kernel, X doesn't even start. See my previous post
on intel-gfx.
This is the failed to pin back buffer error?
I would say yes. dmesg says :
[drm:i915_gem_object_bind_to_gtt] *ERROR*
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:48 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
Hi ,
Since xf86-video-intel 2.5 needs libdrm 2.4.0 , we need Mesa 7.2 ?
or is enough ? just upgrade libdrm , and compile xf86-video-intel 2.5
for xserver 1.4.2
No, it needs libdrm 2.4.0. That doesn't imply anything about
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I hope to do on
Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into build issues,
etc.
configure wants libdrm 2.4.0 which has yet to be released. I've tried
tweaking configure.ac to get it to build
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 20:50 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I hope to do
on
Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into build issues,
etc.
configure wants libdrm 2.4.0 which has yet to be
On Sunday 19 of October 2008, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I hope to
do on Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into build
issues, etc.
configure wants libdrm 2.4.0 which has yet to be
Eric Anholt a écrit :
I couldn't find any clearer release process for it than tag it and dump
a tarball into this directory -- if any other DRM maintainer-types want
to suggest an appropriate process, I'd love to hear.
Hum, my apologies. Since I hadn't seen any announcement on xorg-announce
Quoting Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 20:50 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I
hope to do on
Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into
build issues,
etc.
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 23:51 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:16:10PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 20:50 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jesse Barnes a écrit :
This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I hope to
do on
Rémi Cardona a écrit :
rendering errors in Firefox 3 and gnome-terminal (both of which use render).
I've built everything using libdrm 2.4.0, so that's not an issue anymore.
However, I can definitely confirm the rendering errors on my 855GM. See
the attached screen shot.
Should I file a
18 matches
Mail list logo
