Benjamin Otte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Soeren Sandmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- When mask is 0, there is no reason to read the source.
- There is no reason to read the destination if the inverse
combined src/mask is 0
Don't compilers
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Soeren Sandmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- When mask is 0, there is no reason to read the source.
- There is no reason to read the destination if the inverse
combined src/mask is 0
Don't compilers take care of that?
The code looks better to me if
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Soeren Sandmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
Overall, the separable blend mode stuff looks good, except for the
component alpha versions.
New update pushed to my git branches of pixman/cairo.
I've updated the separable blend modes according to your
Hey,
I've updated the patch again here at the hackfest, and as far as I'm
concerned the patch can go in now. But I'd like you to ok it before I
push it.
We decided to prefix the non-seperable blend-modes with HSL to avoid
the confusion with the SATURATE operator. Otherwise I've used the
exact
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 01:54 +0200, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
This sort of suggests that instead of adding all the PDF blend modes
as separate operators, they could instead be given as modifiers to an
existing operator. For example, you could then specify IN and
MULTIPLY, and the result would be
