Re: What's wrong with xkbcomp?

2008-09-23 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:35:12PM +0100, Simos Xenitellis wrote: An issue that is often discussed is the xkbcomp utility, that parses the xkeyboard-config configuration files and produces a binary XKM file that X.Org can

Re: What's wrong with xkbcomp?

2008-09-23 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:35:12PM +0100, Simos Xenitellis wrote: An issue that is often discussed is the xkbcomp utility, that parses the xkeyboard-config configuration files and produces a binary XKM file that X.Org can

Re: What's wrong with xkbcomp?

2008-09-23 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 02:42:29AM +0100, Simos Xenitellis wrote: The next step in replacing xkbcomp would be to list any of the structures we many want to eliminate or reduce some of the fields. xkb_keymap | xkb_keycodes | xkb_types | xkb_compatibility |

Re: What's wrong with xkbcomp?

2008-09-23 Thread James Cloos
Simos == Simos Xenitellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Simos only xkb_symbols{} is likely to change by the user, when X.org is used Simos on a small device. If it is possible to add an external keyboard to Simos the small device, then xkb_geometry, xkb_keycodes may change as well. And compat. The