Re: Problems with xf86-input-synaptics 1.5.99.901

2012-03-23 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 03/21/2012 02:55 PM, Ilya Ilembitov wrote: Hi, all. I have HP Envy 13 which uses a single button design of Synaptics Clickpad. Using Arch Linux I have updated to xf86-input-synaptics 1.5.99.901 which is supposed to bring proper support for my touchpad. What works: -drag and drop

[ANNOUNCE] xcb-proto 1.7.1

2012-03-23 Thread Julien Danjou
Hey, xcb-proto 1.7.1 is out. Not a big deal though. Changes: Alex Plotnick (1): Rename the ExprType parent attribute to parents. Arnaud Fontaine (3): Add ge and xf86vidmode protocol descriptions. Remove now unnecessary files as everything is implemented in xcbgen. Add

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ast 0.93.10

2012-03-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Aspeed Tech driver update for compatibility with Xorg 1.12 ABI Adam Jackson (4): Adapt to domain changes in videoabi 12 Check ABI major not encoded ABI Make failure to XAA non-fatal Fix for new vgaHW ABI Alan Coopersmith (1): xf86-video-ast 0.93.10 git tag:

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-mach64 6.9.1

2012-03-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Driver release for compatibility with Xorg 1.12 ABI. Adam Jackson (1): Fall back to shadowfb if XAA is unavailable Alan Coopersmith (1): xf86-video-mach64 6.9.1 Jeremy Huddleston (2): Use unsigned long rather than deprecated IOADDRESS Use pci_device_map_legacy rather

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-neomagic 1.2.6

2012-03-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Driver release for compatibility with Xorg 1.12 ABI Adam Jackson (2): Fall back to shadowfb when XAA is unavailable Fix for new vgahw ABI Alan Coopersmith (1): xf86-video-neomagic 1.2.6 Gaetan Nadon (10): config: upgrade to util-macros 1.8 for additional man page support

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-savage 2.3.4

2012-03-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Driver release for compatibility with Xorg server 1.12 ABI. Adam Jackson (3): Don't include xf86Priv.h Fall back to shadowfb if XAA is unavailable Fix for new vgahw ABI Alan Coopersmith (2): Add savage_pciids.h to src/Makefile.am to fix distcheck xf86-video-savage

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-siliconmotion 1.7.6

2012-03-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Driver release for compatibility with Xorg 1.12 ABI. Adam Jackson (4): Adapt to missing PIOOffset in videoabi 12 Check ABI major not encoded ABI Make failure to XAA non-fatal Fix for new vgaHW ABI Alan Coopersmith (1): xf86-video-siliconmotion 1.7.6 Matt Turner

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-sis 0.10.4

2012-03-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Driver release for compatibility with Xorg 1.12 ABI. Adam Jackson (1): Fall back to shadowfb if XAA is unavailable Alan Coopersmith (2): Convert sis.man from XORG_RAWCPP to using sed like other drivers xf86-video-sis 0.10.4 Fernando Carrijo (1): Purge macros NEED_EVENTS

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-trident 1.3.5

2012-03-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Driver release for compatibility with Xorg 1.12 ABI Adam Jackson (2): Fall back to shadowfb if XAA is unavailable Fix for new vgaHW ABI Alan Coopersmith (1): xf86-video-trident 1.3.5 Gaetan Nadon (10): config: upgrade to util-macros 1.8 for additional man page support

Re: [RFC] server-private and public header separation

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:48:53PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote: On 03/22/2012 09:25 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: This is just a quickfire patch to show the principle, it has not been tested much. Plus, it's more of an idea right now, not sure if I'll find the time to do it. Right now, we

C99 inline keyword

2012-03-23 Thread Tomas Carnecky
These two patches replace all custom inline keywords with a plain `inline`, while still maintaining backwards compatibility through a autoconf macro. ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info:

[PATCH 1/2] Standartize on C99 inline

2012-03-23 Thread Tomas Carnecky
The current code uses a mix of inline, __inline, __inline__ and _X_INLINE. Settle on C99 inline, but add AC_C_INLINE to configure.ac to take care of old compilers. Also remove reference to _X_INLINE in doc/c-extensions. Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky tomas.carne...@gmail.com --- Xext/security.c

[PATCH 2/2] Convert remaining code to use C99 inline

2012-03-23 Thread Tomas Carnecky
But keep compatibility defines for __inline and __inline__ in case some drivers still use those (hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h). Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky tomas.carne...@gmail.com --- hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h | 289 -- hw/xfree86/x86emu/sys.c

Re: [PATCH synaptics] conf: the bcm5974 doesn't have Apple in the product name

2012-03-23 Thread Keith Packard
#part sign=pgpmime On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:49:39 +1000, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: But it's still a single-button device from the known fruit manufacturer. This definitely helps with my machine -- it gets rid of a frequently annoying habit where the driver generated button

Re: [RFC] server-private and public header separation

2012-03-23 Thread Keith Packard
#part sign=pgpmime On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:25:44 +1000, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: Is that something we want? Should we should be splitting the files apart instead? -- keith.pack...@intel.com ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org

Re: Stable branch reformatting issues

2012-03-23 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:58:59PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote: I think that's a bit overkill. If we are going to reformat the 1.11 and earlier branches, then we might as well leave it at that and let the downstreams worry about it. Or, actually have someone maintain a pre-formatted branch.

Re: [RFC] server-private and public header separation

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Hutterer
On 23/03/12 16:37 , Keith Packard wrote: #part sign=pgpmime On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:25:44 +1000, Peter Huttererpeter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: Is that something we want? Should we should be splitting the files apart instead? Good point, but that would only get us half-way. We currently

indent quirks

2012-03-23 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
Is there a way we can tweak indent to not mess up blocks like this: } known_numeric_keys[] = { -{65, XK_period, XK_KP_Decimal}, -{67, XK_asterisk, XK_KP_Multiply}, -{69, XK_plus, XK_KP_Add}, -{75, XK_slash, XK_KP_Divide}, -{76, 0x0103, XK_KP_Enter}, -{78, XK_minus,

Re: [RFC] server-private and public header separation

2012-03-23 Thread Jamey Sharp
On 3/22/12, Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote: On 03/22/2012 09:25 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: This patch introduces a new define __XSERVER__ that we can use in the sdk headers. Obviously the real integration will be a tad harder as there are other headers that are installed

Re: [RFC] server-private and public header separation

2012-03-23 Thread Chase Douglas
On 03/23/2012 07:14 AM, Jamey Sharp wrote: On 3/22/12, Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote: On 03/22/2012 09:25 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: This patch introduces a new define __XSERVER__ that we can use in the sdk headers. Obviously the real integration will be a tad harder as there

Re: [RFC] server-private and public header separation

2012-03-23 Thread Chase Douglas
On 03/22/2012 11:07 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:48:53PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote: On 03/22/2012 09:25 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: This is just a quickfire patch to show the principle, it has not been tested much. Plus, it's more of an idea right now, not sure if I'll

Re: indent quirks

2012-03-23 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 02:44:41 23.03.2012 UTC-07 when jerem...@apple.com did gyre and gimble: JH Is there a way we can tweak indent to not mess up blocks like this: I had to resort to post-processing script recently, exactly for this issue. -- pgpzeQ4QCCPnj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: indent quirks

2012-03-23 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 23 March 2012 15:13, Mikhail Gusarov dotted...@dottedmag.net wrote: Twas brillig at 02:44:41 23.03.2012 UTC-07 when jerem...@apple.com did gyre and gimble:  JH Is there a way we can tweak indent to not mess up blocks like this: I had to resort to post-processing script recently,

Re: [RFC] server-private and public header separation

2012-03-23 Thread Keith Packard
#part sign=pgpmime On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:30:30 +1000, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: Good point, but that would only get us half-way. We currently export things like the GrabRec as well, just because they are in the same header. These could be moved into a private header.

Re: indent quirks

2012-03-23 Thread Keith Packard
#part sign=pgpmime On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:45:42 +, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote: Hi, On 23 March 2012 15:13, Mikhail Gusarov dotted...@dottedmag.net wrote: Twas brillig at 02:44:41 23.03.2012 UTC-07 when jerem...@apple.com did gyre and gimble:  JH Is there a way we can

Re: indent quirks

2012-03-23 Thread Søren Sandmann
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com writes: Yeah, if you come up with a script that fixes things, we can apply that. Alternatively, just post cleanup patches and we'll merge them in and hope that we don't impact cross-version patches too much. Fixing 20 years of format neglect isn't going to be

Re: C99 inline keyword

2012-03-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 03/22/12 02:50 AM, Tomas Carnecky wrote: These two patches replace all custom inline keywords with a plain `inline`, while still maintaining backwards compatibility through a autoconf macro. For both patches: Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com And I'm in favor of the

[PATCH xf86-input-synaptics 1/2] Count number of multitouch touches for multitouch finger count

2012-03-23 Thread Chase Douglas
The evdev protocol only goes up to three touches for non-multitouch devices. If you perform a four touch tap, the finger count will only go up to three touches if you roll your fingers, or will always be 0 if all four touches land at the same time. This change ensures the correct finger count is

[PATCH xf86-input-synaptics 2/2] Do not perform a tap action when more than three touches

2012-03-23 Thread Chase Douglas
Though this looks like a behavior change, it really isn't since the maximum tap_max_fingers that was previously possible was already handled. The only real change is that if a tap is recognized but the tap_max_fingers is zero, a tap will no longer be emitted. This shouldn't happen in the real

Re: indent quirks

2012-03-23 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 18:05 +0100, Søren Sandmann wrote: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com writes: Yeah, if you come up with a script that fixes things, we can apply that. Alternatively, just post cleanup patches and we'll merge them in and hope that we don't impact cross-version patches

[PATCH gccmakedep] Add parsing of GCC option '-std='.

2012-03-23 Thread Anderson Luiz da Silva
Especially useful when forcing language standards. Correct error when using experimental code in GCC (-std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x.) Signed-off-by: Anderson Luiz da Silva anderson.si...@autotrac.com.br --- gccmakedep.in |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] Added an xorg configuration file snippet to disable grabbing of virtual test devices. Signed-off-by: Thomas Voß tvoss@tvoss-ThinkPad-X121e.(none)

2012-03-23 Thread Chase Douglas
On 03/23/2012 11:50 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 14:59:19 -0400, thomas.v...@canonical.com wrote: From: Thomas Voß tvoss@tvoss-ThinkPad-X121e.(none) --- data/Makefile.am |2 +- data/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-virtual-test-devices.conf |

Re: [RFC] server-private and public header separation

2012-03-23 Thread Bart Massey
One lower-impact compromise would be to simply rename private fields of the structs to something obviously wrong when compiling without __XSERVER__. Easy-ish patches to get right, and preserves ABI compatibility. If you generate the secret names with a macro, you can change them regularly to

Re: XQuartz tablet mouse events are at the wrong location and other Xinput headaches

2012-03-23 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
On Mar 21, 2012, at 00:23, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: On Mar 20, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:49:53AM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: Here are some examples. The first is just valuator_mask_get_double(..., #) for the

Re: [PATCH] xrandr: move transform limit checking after scaling

2012-03-23 Thread Pierre-Loup A. Griffais
Ping? On 03/20/2012 04:54 PM, Pierre-Loup A. Griffais wrote: Wasted a good chunk of time on that one. ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Re: indent quirks

2012-03-23 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
Yeah, our new indent policy butchers ObjC, unfortunately. On Mar 23, 2012, at 11:34, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 18:05 +0100, Søren Sandmann wrote: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com writes: Yeah, if you come up with a script that fixes things, we can apply that. Alternatively,

[PULL] XQuartz changes which have been pending, rebased against indent

2012-03-23 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
The following changes since commit a7eac500e652f30deffd9dc5e623fab701077738: Merge branch 'per-device-sync-counters' into for-keith (2012-03-22 13:13:07 +1000) are available in the git repository at: git://people.freedesktop.org/~jeremyhu/xserver master for you to fetch changes up to

Re: [PATCH] xrandr: move transform limit checking after scaling

2012-03-23 Thread Keith Packard
#part sign=pgpmime On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:54:52 -0700, Pierre-Loup A. Griffais pgriff...@nvidia.com wrote: Wasted a good chunk of time on that one. From f1a65814f119cb83d16e15093e81946f3adcde61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pierre-Loup A. Griffais pgriff...@nvidia.com Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #10 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net 2012-03-23 01:23:00 PDT --- Has anyone tried if this happens with the upstream 6.14.3 release, or possibly even older releases? If it doesn't, can someone bisect? I haven't seen this on any

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #11 from Ernst Sjöstrand ern...@gmail.com 2012-03-23 01:39:08 PDT --- So if I start a bisect it's xorg-driver-ati I should test? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #12 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net 2012-03-23 02:19:38 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) So if I start a bisect it's xorg-driver-ati I should test? Whichever of that or xserver / kernel you can find a good snapshot for. But

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #13 from Torsten Krah tk...@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de 2012-03-23 02:30:46 PDT --- Created attachment 58906 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=58906 another screenshot -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #14 from Torsten Krah tk...@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de 2012-03-23 02:31:10 PDT --- Created attachment 58907 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=58907 dmesg -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #15 from Torsten Krah tk...@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de 2012-03-23 02:31:30 PDT --- Created attachment 58908 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=58908 Xorg.log -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 Torsten Krah tk...@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #17 from piroxil...@gmail.com 2012-03-23 05:31:38 PDT --- It's not ounly in Gnome, but also both KDE, Xfce4, so the name of the topic is wrong. As I wrote in deleted duplication (47573) last stable version of driver works correctly.

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #18 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2012-03-23 06:28:48 PDT --- For those using mesa from git or a 3.3 kernel, these might be 2D tiling related. See bug 47765. To check, use mesa 8.0 or older and make sure to remove the

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #19 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2012-03-23 07:34:54 PDT --- (In reply to comment #18) For those using mesa from git or a 3.3 kernel, these might be 2D tiling related. See bug 47765. To check, use mesa 8.0 or older and make

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #20 from Torsten Krah tk...@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de 2012-03-23 08:48:12 PDT --- I am using a ATI RV516 [Radeon X1300/X1550 Series] - so the cause must be something else and it does happen with stock oneiric version and edgers

[Bug 47776] New: Choppy video playback

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47776 Bug #: 47776 Summary: Choppy video playback Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: 7.6 (2010.12) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #21 from Ernst Sjöstrand ern...@gmail.com 2012-03-23 13:01:54 PDT --- Actually I can reproduce this with Precise vanilla right now, only with Precise + edgers. Also if I have Precise + edgers and downgrade only libcairo I can't

[Bug 47266] Graphics corruption in Gnome windows (Radeon/Barts)

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #22 from Ernst Sjöstrand ern...@gmail.com 2012-03-23 13:44:05 PDT --- Sorry, meant: Actually I CAN'T reproduce this with Precise vanilla right now, only with Precise + edgers. -- Configure bugmail: