2018 Election voting OPEN

To all X.Org Foundation Members: The X.Org Foundation's annual election is now open and will remain open until 23:59 UTC on 5 April 2018. Four of the eight director seats are open during this election, with the four nominees receiving the highest vote totals serving as directors for two year

2018 Election voting OPEN

To all X.Org Foundation Members: The X.Org Foundation's annual election is now open and will remain open until 23:59 UTC on 5 April 2018. Four of the eight director seats are open during this election, with the four nominees receiving the highest vote totals serving as directors for two year

Re: [PATCH xserver] modesetting: Fix page flipping under DRI 3.2.

Thanks. However, seems we may have one more problem with the new code on slightly older < gen 9 Intel hw. Either that, or something is botched on my system atm., after pulling in all kind of updates to xorg-proto and xcb-proto and libdrm and stuff to make the server and mesa compile again. Using

Re: [PATCH xserver 2/5] Remove always true GLAMOR_HAS_DRM_* guards

Hi, Sorry, I've initially missed this email and only saw your request for follow-up. On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 18:45 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Emil Velikov > > With earlier commit the required version was bumped to 2.4.89, thus > the > guards always evaluate to

Re: [PATCH xserver] present: cap the version returned to the client

On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:02 -0600, Keith Packard wrote: > Julien Cristau writes: > > > Doesn't this break when e.g. client supports 2.2 and server supports > > 1.4, where we'll return 2.2 instead of 1.4? i.e. it seems to me this > > should be > > > > if (rep.majorVersion >

Re: [PATCH xserver] exa: promise not to touch the data when swapping pointers

On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 16:37 +, Eric Engestrom wrote: > Hmm, forgot to reply, sorry about that: > I've had the patch locally for just about forever, so I don't remember > exactly, but I think I hit some issue with one of the callers and when > I looked at the implementations I noticed this. I

Re: [PATCH xserver] exa: promise not to touch the data when swapping pointers

On Wednesday, 2018-03-21 11:24:50 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 15:37 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > > On 13 March 2018 at 10:55, Eric Engestrom wrote: > > > exa/exa.c:525:10: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from > > > pointer

Re: [PATCH xserver] modesetting: Fix page flipping under DRI 3.2.

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 17:11 +, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 12 March 2018 at 16:57, Mario Kleiner wrote: > > The check for "no modifier specified" in drmmode_is_format_supported() > > should check for DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID, not for zero, as zero actually > > means

Re: [PATCH xserver 1/5] configure: remove libdrm version check

On 21 March 2018 at 14:12, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 16:41 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> Humble ping? >> >> Patch 2 might need a respin based on the feedback from Daniel/Louis. >> Although the rest of the series should be pretty trivial. > > Said feedback

Re: [PATCH xserver] present: cap the version returned to the client

On 21 March 2018 at 08:02, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 16:04:43 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> From: Emil Velikov >> >> As per the protocol, the server should not return version greater than >> the one supported by the client.

Re: [PATCH xserver] exa: promise not to touch the data when swapping pointers

On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 15:37 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 13 March 2018 at 10:55, Eric Engestrom wrote: > > exa/exa.c:525:10: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from > > pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] > > swap(pExaGC, pGC, funcs); >

Re: [PATCH xserver] Xext/shm: Downgrade from error to debug log output about success

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 15:12 +0300, Alexander Volkov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexander Volkov remote: I: patch #209879 updated using rev d36128a72acac4d54813c52c93efefad2dc9af41. remote: I: 1 patch(es) updated to state Accepted. To

Re: [PATCH xserver v2 0/4] Improve elevated priv check, honor LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH

On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 17:46 -0400, Ben Crocker wrote: > Submit Nicolai Hähnle's four-patch series improving the checks for > elevated privileges and culminating in using the runtime environmental > control LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH when searching for driver .so's, as > Mesa, and hence Glamor, already do.

Re: [PATCH xserver] present: cap the version returned to the client

Julien Cristau writes: > Doesn't this break when e.g. client supports 2.2 and server supports > 1.4, where we'll return 2.2 instead of 1.4? i.e. it seems to me this > should be > > if (rep.majorVersion > stuff->majorVersion || > (rep.majorVersion == stuff->majorVersion

Re: [PATCH xserver 1/5] configure: remove libdrm version check

On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 16:41 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > Humble ping? > > Patch 2 might need a respin based on the feedback from Daniel/Louis. > Although the rest of the series should be pretty trivial. Said feedback appears not to be in my mailbox? The XXX bits should be cleaned up but this is

Re: [PATCH xserver] present: cap the version returned to the client

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 16:04:43 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Emil Velikov > > As per the protocol, the server should not return version greater than > the one supported by the client. > > Add a spec quote and tweak the numbers accordingly. > > Fixes: