Am 17.05.2019 21:51, schrieb Thomas Dickey:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:26:10PM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 17.05.2019 13:01, schrieb James Larrowe:
>>> I use _WIN32 or __WIN32__ depending on the context.
>>>
>> my idea was to reduce the number of defines :)
>>
>> the problem is that
Am 17.05.2019 21:57, schrieb Thomas Dickey:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:08:47AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>> Hi list,
>> is there a common ground for using OS related defines ?
>> I was look at some libs and found some defines that
>> look pretty ancient. And some like
>> WIN32 vs _WIN32
>>
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:08:47AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
> Hi list,
> is there a common ground for using OS related defines ?
> I was look at some libs and found some defines that
> look pretty ancient. And some like
> WIN32 vs _WIN32
however, they're distinct:
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:26:10PM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.05.2019 13:01, schrieb James Larrowe:
> > I use _WIN32 or __WIN32__ depending on the context.
> >
> my idea was to reduce the number of defines :)
>
> the problem is that i have no way to test what would happen if
> i
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:08:47AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
> Hi list,
> is there a common ground for using OS related defines ?
> I was look at some libs and found some defines that
> look pretty ancient. And some like
> WIN32 vs _WIN32
> seems to confuse other people also ( ask you search
On 5/17/19 1:08 AM, walter harms wrote:
I found also:
ISC *
MOTOROLA *
VMS*
USG*
sgi
ultrix *
__osf__ *
We've removed a bunch of code using those defines already (I've mostly
used #unifdef to do so, with manual editing only for special cases).
We still need the #ifdefs for sun &
If that's what you want to do, then I suggest to just use _WIN32 for
everything.
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Am 17.05.2019 13:01, schrieb James Larrowe:
> I use _WIN32 or __WIN32__ depending on the context.
>
my idea was to reduce the number of defines :)
the problem is that i have no way to test what would happen if
i replace WIN32 with _WIN32.
So the question is left, is WIN32 still used ?
re,
On 2019-05-17 12:20 p.m., Felix Miata wrote:
> I've found examples used:
> LVDS
> AUTO
> on https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Xorg/Multiple_monitors, and
> CRT
> CRT+LFP
> on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XineramaHowTo
>
> but no example anywhere where two LCDs are used. man xorg.conf has no
>
I've found examples used:
LVDS
AUTO
on https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Xorg/Multiple_monitors, and
CRT
CRT+LFP
on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XineramaHowTo
but no example anywhere where two LCDs are used. man xorg.conf has no instance
of
the string MonitorLayout. man modesetting and man
Hi list,
is there a common ground for using OS related defines ?
I was look at some libs and found some defines that
look pretty ancient. And some like
WIN32 vs _WIN32
seems to confuse other people also ( ask you search engine)
I found also:
ISC *
MOTOROLA *
VMS*
USG*
hpux
sgi
sparc
sun
11 matches
Mail list logo
