On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:06:30 -0400
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Hello Dennis,
>That has worked since about 2013 however it has been a while since I
>tried. Something odd here ... not sure what it is yet.
I'm no programmer/compiling guru, but;
Missing the correct -dev package, perhaps? Bearing in mind
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:03:14 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
Hello Gene,
>It came from j...@eukor.com. As was noted in my initial response.
Sorry, I missed that. Neither did I see the message; It got binned
before reaching my MUA.
Right, normal service, etc. etc.
--
Regards _
/ )
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:06:36 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
Hello Gene,
>No, here, when I enabled the html display of that poorly composed
>message,
Alex's message had no HTML? Are you sure you're talking about his
perfectly legitimate post to the list?
--
Regards _
/ ) "The
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:00:56 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
Hello Gene,
>This stuff doesn't work for mailing lists, and whom ever's bright idea
What stuff? PGP Signing?
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
The public w
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:24:45 +0100
Julien Cristau wrote:
Hello Julien,
>If this isn't just me, any chance to get the tarball checksums in a
It isn't just you. I see the bad signature report too. I suspect the
reason is due to some post signing line-wrapping of the SHA256 checksum
lines.
--
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:41:41 -0600
Gregory Merchan wrote:
Hello Gregory,
>I assume this serves as a caveat and not a description of a bug.
I'm not on the dev team, but;
Personally, I'd go for bug. Whilst it's tricky (impossible) to start
drawing halfway across a pixel the background maths sho
