Hi,
On 3 September 2012 21:39, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I hope you don't mind that I won't repond to Daniel's somewhat
childish remarks.
While there may have been a little more levity than needed, there was
a serious point. The last time your compiler was updated, Boris
Hi,
On 1 September 2012 10:21, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
I do wonder though about the viability of updating some parts of your system
to 2012 releases while keeping others stuck at a 2001 release. I certainly
don't try to build current X.Org releases on Solaris 8
Hi,
On 1 September 2012 03:33, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
From: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:17:46 -0700
Please don't do this. Some OpenBSD platforms are still stuck with GCC
2.95.3. GCC 2.95.3 is almost a C99 compiler, but
Hi,
On 23 August 2012 08:40, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:47:12PM -0400, Matt Whitlock wrote:
This patch adds one configuration option, DebounceDelay, and one XInput
property, Evdev Debounce Delay. They refer to the amount of time to wait
after
Hi,
On 16 August 2012 09:13, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
index 4da49fe..2e36349 100644
--- a/COPYING
+++ b/COPYING
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
Copyright (C) 2011, 2012 Canonical, Ltd.
+Copyright © 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
Do you really have to pollute more source files with non-ASCII
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
glx_extinit.h wants a copyright header (lame, but eh), but aside from that:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org
by the declaration,
and not the proper one from glxdriswrast.c, presumably because nothing else
references anything in the object that file generates.
Crap. This is obviously correct.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
___
xorg
Hi,
On 20 July 2012 06:05, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 19, 2012 3:38 PM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
A more sensible interim
strategy (IMO) would be to always fork xkbcomp once during startup,
preserve the resulting XkbDescRec, then hand that back every time
Hi,
On 19 July 2012 21:33, Adam Jackson a...@nwnk.net wrote:
I think there's a combination of factors that pile on to make it worse than
you'd expect.
Oh no, we're talking about totally different things here. When I said
with xkbcommon rather than xkbcomp, I meant that this thing:
Hi,
On 19 July 2012 22:53, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Adam Jackson a...@nwnk.net writes:
I think there's a combination of factors that pile on to make it worse
than you'd expect.
And, caching is completely free, so it seems sensible to just do it
It's free to not unlink the
Hi,
On 19 July 2012 14:07, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I remember my disappointment when I discovered all the protocol
for modifying an existing keymap rather than just starting a new one.
I've been coming across fresh disappointment every week for the last
eight years. ;)
, forgot about cw!
The other two are varying degrees of cosmetic, but the doc fix should
definitely go in.
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http
Oops, forgot the list ...
On 18 July 2012 10:15, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
Hi,
Nitpicking I know, but how about -print-xkm-cache-dir or something?
-xserver is a bit redundant when you're starting the X server ...
On 17 July 2012 22:41, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote
On 17 July 2012 07:13, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Acked-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http
Hi,
On 17 July 2012 07:13, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
The indenter seems to have gotten confused by initializing arrays of
structs with the struct defined inline - for predefined structs it did
a better job, so match that.
It'd be nice if this consistently used spaces
Hi,
On 13 July 2012 13:34, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I actually have the time to work on this, but I'd been
thinking about xkbcommon lately. Do you think it's possible to build a
compatibility layer around the current code? Either the compat code
could live in the
Hi,
On 13 July 2012 16:55, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com writes:
Not that I actually have the time to work on this, but I'd been
thinking about xkbcommon lately. Do you think it's possible to build a
compatibility layer around the current code?
I
Hi,
On 13 July 2012 21:08, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
This can be used to clear any cache files when loading new XKB
configuration files.
It gets installed in $(SERVERCONFIG) (by default, $libdir/xorg)
Why not make this part of xorg-server.pc, or an xorg-server --xkb-default-dir?
Hi,
On 13 July 2012 21:08, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Construct a unique filename based on the display name and the RMLVO
values. If that file contains valid contents, use it. Otherwise,
compile the keymap to that file and don't unlink it so that it will be
re-used the next time
want to create a wrapper for GlxExtensionInit that
calls glxWinPushNativeProvider and then calls through to
GlxExtensionInit, rather than doing it here.
Other than that, for the series:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers (and sorry!),
Daniel
Hi,
On 12 July 2012 23:07, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Construct a unique filename based on the display name and the RMLVO
values. If that file contains valid contents, use it. Otherwise,
compile the keymap to that file and don't unlink it so that it will be
re-used the next time
I hate this [redacted] script.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
hw/xfree86/sdksyms.sh |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/sdksyms.sh b/hw/xfree86/sdksyms.sh
index c0398da..07372ad 100755
--- a/hw/xfree86/sdksyms.sh
+++ b/hw/xfree86/sdksyms.sh
Hi,
On 10 July 2012 05:03, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Should the xorg_list_init in SyncExtensionInit be moved inside its
if (RTCounter == 0) check then, so it doesn't reset the list back to
empty after you've done this?
Yes, definitely. I'll fix that up - thanks!
Sync is designed to let you add system counters before the extension has
been initialised, which means the system counter list may well be full
of bees. Make sure it's initialised before we add to it, to avoid the
risk of fatal injury.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
Xext
Since we call directly into XKB and may be doing so before the extension
has been initialised, make sure its privates are set up first. XTest
had a hack to do this itself, but seems cleaner to just make sure we do
it in AllocDevicePair.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
dix
Hi,
Without these two patches, initialisation is broken for me, and the
server asserts (without the XKB patch) or segfaults (without the Sync
patch). I'm not really sure how it's working for others, and looking
at these in context they seem correct, so ...
Cheers,
Daniel
Hi,
On 10 July 2012 12:43, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 July 2012 03:02, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
If failing to disable a protocol specified by -nolisten failed, we'd
throw a FatalError and bomb startup entirely. From poking at xtrans, it
looks like
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
src/evdev.c |4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/evdev.c b/src/evdev.c
index c273326..232e406 100644
--- a/src/evdev.c
+++ b/src/evdev.c
@@ -1065,7 +1065,9 @@ EvdevProcessEvent(InputInfoPtr pInfo, struct input_event
Since we call directly into XKB and may be doing so before the extension
has been initialised, make sure its privates are set up first. XTest
had a hack to do this itself, but seems cleaner to just make sure we do
it in AllocDevicePair.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
dix
Hi,
This should hopefully be the very totally final version of the extmod
patches. These have all had to be rebased, and some have had to have
minor tweaks, so I've sent them out again.
The list of changes are below; obviously all the new patches will need
review, but the changes to the rest are
a security risk.
And it makes it possible to start gdm even though you've built with
--disable-tcp-transport.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
os/utils.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/os/utils.c b/os/utils.c
index 2537934..b00d38b 100644
Sync is designed to let you add system counters before the extension has
been initialised, which means the system counter list may well be full
of bees. Make sure it's initialised before we add to it, to avoid the
risk of fatal injury.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
Xext
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
Xext/Makefile.am |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Xext/Makefile.am b/Xext/Makefile.am
index 5929a3e..4082de7 100644
--- a/Xext/Makefile.am
+++ b/Xext/Makefile.am
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ MODULE_SRCS += $(XV_SRCS
-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
hw/xfree86/Makefile.am |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/Makefile.am b/hw/xfree86/Makefile.am
index 4d5d576..f74691b 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/Makefile.am
Does what it says on the box, replacing those from Xi/ and glx/.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte
Huh, so I guess INITARGS used to be int argc, char *argv then. Either
way, it's now void, so fix that ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
Xext/bigreq.c|4 +-
Xext
Reorder static extension initialisation in miinitext for non-Xorg
servers to match Xorg's order.
Tested with Xephyr; checked that the extension list was identical before
and after.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
mi
xf86ExtensionInit is called after configuration file parsing, so it can
perform the two parts of extension initialisation currently done by
extmod: enabling and disabling of extensions through an 'omit' option,
and SELinux configuration.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed
EXTERN_MODULE was used to specify that we shouldn't worry about modules
lacking a ModuleData object. It was also completely unused. *shrug*
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Module.h |3 ---
hw
externsion.h required bits from Xfuncproto.h and dixstruct.h, but
included neither; fix that.
It also had _XFUNCPROTOBEGIN and _XFUNCPROTOEND wrappers, which is a bit
pointless for a server-only library, as it's only needed for C++.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed
From: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Rather than languishing in its own special module, move RECORD into the
core server.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Create extinit.h (and xf86Extensions.h, for Xorg-specific extensions) to
hold all our extension initialisation prototypes, rather than
duplicating them everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
Xext/bigreq.c
From: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Always build DPMS support into the core server, rather than letting it
languish in extmod.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Signed-off-by: Peter
Instead of letting it languish in extmod just because we want to
configure bits of it from xf86, move XSELinux to the builtin part of
Xext, and do its configuration from xf86ExtensionInit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Reviewed
GLX was the only user of extension init order dependencies, using them
to depend on Composite, which has always been built-in anyway, and DBE,
which is now built-in.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
hw/xfree86/dixmods
NULL sentinels are totally lame.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
mi/miinitext.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mi/miinitext.c b/mi/miinitext.c
index ef20a11..c4749f5 100644
--- a/mi/miinitext.c
+++ b/mi/miinitext.c
extmod was originally a big pointless module. Now it's an empty,
pointless module. This commit makes it unexist.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
Xext/Makefile.am
Instead of keeping a tiny amount of code in an external module, just man
up and build it into the core server.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
---
hw/xfree86/Makefile.am |8 +---
hw/xfree86/common/Makefile.am
...@dbservice.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
Xext/xvdix.h |4
Xext/xvmain.c| 12
Xext/xvmc.c
From: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Always build XRes support into the core server, rather than letting it
languish in extmod.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Signed-off-by: Peter
Make sure we add static extensions before anything in a module. This is
more or less a no-op at the moment, but will come in handy later when
extension dependency sorting is removed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
hw
, so we can remove the define.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
hw/xfree86/sdksyms.sh |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/sdksyms.sh b/hw/xfree86/sdksyms.sh
index 6d8a4d3
...@dbservice.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
hw/xfree86/common/dgaproc.h|5 -
hw/xfree86/common/xf86DGA.c| 23 +++
hw/xfree86
be sorted by GLX, so we no longer have any users for it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
COPYING|2 +-
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Extensions.c |4 -
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Module.h |1 -
hw
When the array gets down to size zero (which it does in later patches),
gcc complains that the index is out of bounds. Avoid this by using
ARRAY_SIZE on extensionModules instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
hw/xfree86/dixmods/extmod/modinit.c |8 +---
1 file
In preparation for gutting loadext.c, move the ExtensionModule struct to
the DIX, and unexport ExtensionModuleList (why, why, why, why was this
ever exported in the first place, tbqh).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
---
hw/xfree86
As PseudoramiX is a DDX-specific extension, move its loading and
initialisation to hw/xquartz. This creates a QuartzExtensionInit()
similar in spirit to xf86ExtensionInit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Jeremy
There was nothing XFree86-specific or loader-specific about this, aside
from using xf86MsgVerb instead of ErrorF.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Module.h |6 ---
hw/xfree86/loader/Makefile.am |1 -
hw
Turns out the only thing we use NO_HW_ONLY_EXTS for is to check whether
or not we're building inside the Xorg DDX. Replace it with an
XorgLoader test instead, and remove all its users.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
hw/vfb/Makefile.am |2 --
hw/xnest/Makefile.am
Rather than having a non-Xorg and an Xorg-specific path which basically
just duplicated each other for no reason, we could ... just have one.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am |2 +-
mi
No-one ever did anything with this variable except assign its default
value to it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
---
hw/kdrive/ephyr
No-one has used this since 0a71e154.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
render/glyph.c |2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/render/glyph.c b/render/glyph.c
index
Remove remnants of an earlier experiment which had the GE extension
handling event delivery directly. Nothing's used the resource since, so
purge it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
miinitext.c had a completely separate codepath for non-Xorg servers,
which included tests for Xorg-specific extensions such as
XFree86-VidMode, which were external even to the Xorg DDX. So we can
just remove them, and the associated #undefs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
No drivers used this, so it got unexported, and now it's so unused it
got culled during the link. Take the poor function out behind the shed
and put it out of its misery.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer
Similar (identical) to how it interacts with Render and XFixes, also
call PanoramiXCompositeReset() to restore the Composite dispatch table
to how it was when it started, on reset.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer
Not to be confused with XFree86Loader or XorgLoader. Which are both now
dead too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
configure.ac |1 -
hw/xquartz/xpr/dri.c |5 -
include/xorg-server.h.in |2 +-
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions
From: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
If we've built MIT-SCREEN-SAVER support, then just build it into the
main binary, rather than leaving it in extmod.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
From: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
If DBE support is compiled in the server, just man up and build it into
the server, rather than having it as an external module.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja
These codepaths were never called by anyone. Shame there weren't more
of them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
xkb/XKBGAlloc.c | 129
These were an unused remnant of earlier MPX work; their only users got
cleared out in dc153271, but the mask declarations remained. Remove
them, and move DevicePropertyNotify's mask up to be contiguous with the
rest of the range.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Adam
Rather than building the tiny amount of code required for XFree86-DRI as
an external module, build it in if it's enabled at configure time.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
configure.ac |7 ++-
glx
DRI2DestroyDrawable() was still being _X_EXPORTed, but hasn't existed
since 1da1f33f last year.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
Signed-off
From: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Always build these extensions into the core server, rather than letting
them languish in extmod.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
Signed-off-by: Peter
AM_CFLAGS will suffice, given we only have one target in this directory.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reviewed-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
---
hw/xfree86/dri/Makefile.am | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw
Hi,
On 27 June 2012 17:25, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 06/27/12 07:44 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
If someone in the region wanted to present on a topic related to the
free graphics stack (X.Org, Mesa, DRI, Wayland, etc.) and the only
thing stopping them was travel
had the
arguments that way around too. It just seems like a more logical
order.
That aside:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info
to me.
Acked-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Hi,
On 13 June 2012 16:14, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure actually plugging cards is a good idea. PCIe is
technically designed for hotplug but that does not mean all physical
embodiments are actually hotpluggable, does it?
Think USB.
Cheers,
Daniel
Hi,
On 8 June 2012 23:32, Mike Mestnik cheako+xorg-de...@mikemestnik.net wrote:
On 06/07/2012 11:07 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
No, it just redirects it into more secure channels, such as tunneling over
ssh, instead of having to re-implement the encryption authentication in
the X layer that
On 8 June 2012 03:33, Mike Mestnik cheako+xorg-de...@mikemestnik.net wrote:
I reject this concept, it shouldn't be allowed to spread any further.
I reject your spamming of the list (as well as every LWN comment on
the issue), and I hope to god it doesn't spread any further.
This is a
Hi,
On 5 January 2012 17:01, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hmm...but how many people
1) Build an xorg module from git
A fair few. Modularisation was a huge step for us towards making
X.Org less scary: we can now say 'this should be fixed in git, can you
please pull?' to bug
Hi,
On 25 May 2012 07:09, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/ 2/11 03:27 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
It's also available as a git branch:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~daniels/xserver extension-cleanup
So is it time to dust these off again? As mentioned in the series I
Hi,
On 18 May 2012 20:05, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course it interferes with the existing process.
If it was not used it would be of no use.
You don't have to make it required, if the system is
Hi,
On 9 May 2012 16:13, Ran Benita ran...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:35:23PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Thanks a bunch for all your last changes too, I've merged everything
except the DFLT_XKB_CONFIG_ROOT change and the Unicode tests. Again
for the Unicode tests I want
-
On 11 April 2012 19:58, Ran Benita ran...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:04:25PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Right, so allow it to call through arbitrary function pointers? I was
considering doing that, but wasn't particularly feeling like dealing
with the intracacies of varargs
On 1 May 2012 15:34, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
Didn't think i needed to do so myself. There is this split between how
individual X components are being handled, apparently. I only committed
to my own unichrome driver, and thought that the maintainer of apm or
the X.org release
Hi,
On 25 April 2012 04:45, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 02/25/12 10:30 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Acked-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
I'll push this on Monday too.
Looks like it's still not in there - should I just push myself?
Sorry, got lost in a rebase I
Hi,
On 26 April 2012 16:46, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 04/26/12 04:52 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
I wouldn't be too hugely concerned about porting it to Solaris though
(unless you're porting Wayland too), since the amount of API we need
to expose to implement the XKB
27903)
+ */
This mostly seems OK to me, but breaks the LockNoLock state; I guess
you'd want to directly change base_mods in the other branch. With
that fixed:
Acked-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Hi,
On 18 April 2012 10:51, Daniel Kurtz djku...@chromium.org wrote:
Input drivers like to prepend the device name to logging messages using
LogVHdrMessageVerb(). The current implementation of this function used the
output of a snprintf() as the format string of another snprintf(). This is a
Hi,
On 18 April 2012 13:14, Daniel Kurtz djku...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
On 18 April 2012 10:51, Daniel Kurtz djku...@chromium.org wrote:
Input drivers like to prepend the device name to logging messages using
On 13 April 2012 03:27, Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
Hmmm.. I'm not crazy about putting a single-function quirk inside an
external record, but I can't think of anything better.
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan
Hi,
On 12 April 2012 07:08, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
bit of a hack, we could store this in the device struct but this approach is
sufficient.
Note that this only affects xfree86 devices, virtual devices (master
devices) are enabled anyway.
Can't we add devices while
Hi,
On 5 April 2012 06:19, Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
On 04/04/2012 07:18 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Thanks. (I do note that you removed the \n from the display and
didn't add it to the write of the display to the fd - I don't know
if that matters or not, so figured
Hi,
On 3 April 2012 17:29, Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
I have heard from a few people that they actually prefer this behavior.
I think we either need to stick with what we have or make it
configurable (and maybe change the default).
Peter, any thoughts?
I don't have any
Hi,
On 2 April 2012 11:10, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW there is a several years old bug report with patches to revert
this behaviour and to add an option to revert to using DDC but nobody
ever bothered to review any of them.
That's completely untrue. The patches to revert
Hi,
On 1 April 2012 17:24, Ran Benita ran...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:27:49PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
This should be fairly straightforward for most LEDs, which only
reflect the state of a single locked modifier or group. For LEDs
which reflect multiple states though
401 - 500 of 1609 matches
Mail list logo