Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Claus Assmann
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, Julien Cristau wrote: gpg: BAD signature from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com Same here. If this isn't just me, any chance to get the tarball checksums in a properly signed mail? Hmm, maybe it would be a good idea to have signed tar files (on the server)?

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:24:45 +0100 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Hello Julien, If this isn't just me, any chance to get the tarball checksums in a It isn't just you. I see the bad signature report too. I suspect the reason is due to some post signing line-wrapping of the SHA256

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 25 January 2014 11:57:01 Claus Assmann did opine: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, Julien Cristau wrote: gpg: BAD signature from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com Same here. There's an echo in here. If this isn't just me, any chance to get the tarball checksums in a properly signed

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 25 January 2014 11:59:17 j...@eukor.com did opine: This stuff doesn't work for mailing lists, and whom ever's bright idea it is should be unsubscribed, forthwith. If not sooner. Cheers, Gene -- There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 25 January 2014 12:58:50 Brad Rogers did opine: On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:00:56 -0500 Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote: Hello Gene, This stuff doesn't work for mailing lists, and whom ever's bright idea What stuff? PGP Signing? No, here, when I enabled the html display

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:06:36 -0500 Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote: Hello Gene, No, here, when I enabled the html display of that poorly composed message, Alex's message had no HTML? Are you sure you're talking about his perfectly legitimate post to the list? -- Regards _ / )

Re: signed tar files (was: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0)

2014-01-25 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 01/25/14 07:09 AM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, Julien Cristau wrote: gpg: BAD signature from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com Same here. If this isn't just me, any chance to get the tarball checksums in a properly signed mail? Hmm, maybe it would be a good idea to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 25 January 2014 13:59:30 Brad Rogers did opine: On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:06:36 -0500 Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote: Hello Gene, No, here, when I enabled the html display of that poorly composed message, Alex's message had no HTML? Are you sure you're talking about

Re: signed tar files (was: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0)

2014-01-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:46:03 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 01/25/14 07:09 AM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, Julien Cristau wrote: gpg: BAD signature from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com Same here. If this isn't just me, any chance to get the tarball checksums in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 15:26:51 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: I guess gmail mangled it. Does the attached work any better? Yes, looks good. Thanks! Cheers, Julien ___ xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support Archives:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 25 January 2014 15:33:58 Alex Deucher did opine: I guess gmail mangled it. Does the attached work any better? Alex On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Hi Alex, When trying to verify this message, I get gpg: BAD signature from

Re: signed tar files (was: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0)

2014-01-25 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 01/25/14 07:09 AM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, Julien Cristau wrote: gpg: BAD signature from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com Same here. If this isn't just me, any chance to get the tarball checksums in a properly signed mail? Hmm, maybe it would be a good idea to

Re: signed tar files (was: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0)

2014-01-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:46:03 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 01/25/14 07:09 AM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, Julien Cristau wrote: gpg: BAD signature from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com Same here. If this isn't just me, any chance to get the tarball checksums in

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-24 Thread Alex Deucher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alex Deucher (16): radeon: disallow glamor on pre-R600 asics radeon/kms: add berlin pci ids radeon: enable glamor by default (v4) glamor: require 0.5.1 or newer radeon: fix limit handling for cards with 4G of ram

[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-ati 7.3.0

2014-01-24 Thread Alex Deucher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alex Deucher (16): radeon: disallow glamor on pre-R600 asics radeon/kms: add berlin pci ids radeon: enable glamor by default (v4) glamor: require 0.5.1 or newer radeon: fix limit handling for cards with 4G of ram