Thanks for the insight. I've not heard of a scenario like that. Can you
suggest a tool for the compressing remote access protocol?
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020, 12:13 PM Nathan Kidd wrote:
> On 2020-06-04 8:10 p.m., Joe Hays wrote:
> > I've started looking in to using VirtualGL. I got it working but am
On 2020-06-05 3:29 p.m., Joe Hays wrote:
> Thanks for the insight. I've not heard of a scenario like that. Can you
> suggest a tool for the compressing remote access protocol?
Two open source examples off the top of my head are TurboVNC and xpra
but there are many more I'm sure others can suggest
On 2020-06-04 8:10 p.m., Joe Hays wrote:
> I've started looking in to using VirtualGL. I got it working but am
> finding almost similar performance as the software rendering when using
> vanilla X11 Forwarding. Since this is my first rodeo with VirtualGL I'm
> sure that there is some setting that
Thank you both.
I've started looking in to using VirtualGL. I got it working but am finding
almost similar performance as the software rendering when using vanilla X11
Forwarding. Since this is my first rodeo with VirtualGL I'm sure that there
is some setting that I have not configured
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 13:10 -0400, Nathan Kidd wrote:
> Are you sure you don't want VirtualGL instead?
>
> There is no official GLX protocol for OpenGL 1.5+. NVIDIA implemented
> unofficial protocol with their AllowUnofficialGLXProtocol /
> __GL_ALLOW_UNOFFICIAL_PROTOCOL settings. I think it
On 2020-05-23 12:28 p.m., Joe Hays wrote:
> I cannot find an X11 server for Windows that supports OpenGL 1.5 or
> greater. Xming doesn't, VcXsrv doesn't, Cygwin doesn't, Xmanage doesn't...
>
> Obviously a free solution is preferred but I'll consider commercial if
> it's the only option...
>
>
