The bold bug is fixed in git, but the other one I'm not so sure about. I agree
that the screenshots are different, but I'm no expert on what is correct so
hopefully someone else with more font skills can chime in.
--Jeremy
On Mar 12, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Alan Coopersmith
Thanks for the fix!
On 03/12/12 11:58 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
The bold bug is fixed in git, but the other one I'm not so sure about. I agree that the
screenshots are different, but I'm no expert on what is correct so hopefully
someone else with more font skills can chime in.
--Jeremy
The bold bug is fixed in git, but the other one I'm not so sure about. I agree
that the screenshots are different, but I'm no expert on what is correct so
hopefully someone else with more font skills can chime in.
--Jeremy
On Mar 12, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Alan Coopersmith
Thanks for the fix!
On 03/12/12 11:58 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
The bold bug is fixed in git, but the other one I'm not so sure about. I agree that the
screenshots are different, but I'm no expert on what is correct so hopefully
someone else with more font skills can chime in.
--Jeremy
Distro makers probably want to hold off on packaging the 2.3.0 upgrade
until we get a 2.3.1 release out to fix:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47178
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47196
(I guess no one noticed during the months the broken commits were
Distro makers probably want to hold off on packaging the 2.3.0 upgrade
until we get a 2.3.1 release out to fix:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47178
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47196
(I guess no one noticed during the months the broken commits were
