> I think I could get 1.20 on Ubuntu 19.08, do you know if that's the case?
I should add, the client doesn't want to got to a non-LTS distribution. Doesn't
sound like there's any compelling reason to go there, and hopefully the same
code would run on 1.20 when the time comes.
On 10/9/19 6:05 PM, Software Orchestration wrote:
Hi, I have a client that has a working serial input driver on Ubuntu 14.04,
which is running the Xorg 1.15.1 server.
I'm tasked with getting this to work on Ubuntu 18.04 which is running Xorg
1.19.6
In looking at the X.Org Server wiki page:
Hi, I have a client that has a working serial input driver on Ubuntu 14.04,
which is running the Xorg 1.15.1 server.
I'm tasked with getting this to work on Ubuntu 18.04 which is running Xorg
1.19.6
In looking at the X.Org Server wiki page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.Org_Server
I see that
Hi, I'm working to usw Matrox M9138 on Xorg 1.2I've found only one script
(ftp://ftp.matrox.com/pub/mga/archive/linux/2015/1.4.3/m9xdriver-x86_32-1.4.3-80847-20140908-build_98.run),
but this script want only old xorg and old kernel.
Can you help me to use this Graphics card on recent linux
On Wed, 2019-10-09 at 14:04 +, Andrea Lenarduzzi wrote:
> Hi, I'm working to usw Matrox M9138 on Xorg 1.2
> I've found only one script (
> ftp://ftp.matrox.com/pub/mga/archive/linux/2015/1.4.3/m9xdriver-x86_32-1.4.3-80847-20140908-build_98.run
> ), but this script want only old xorg and old
A collection of build and documentation fixes, one preparatory change
for a new xorgproto release, and a fix for a deadlock bug in _XReply.
Thanks to all who contributed.
Adam Jackson (3):
makekeys: Detach ourselves from X headers entirely
xkb: Provide ourselves
libX11 1.6.9
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 09:59:29 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On 09-10-2019 09:47, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:19:45 +0200
> > Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> >> My main reason for suggesting either one is that I personally am aware
> >> of at least 2 issues (both
Hi all,
Once more huge thanks to the entire team from Collabora,
for their great work organizing XDC 2019!
As usual we're looking for feedback on both XDC itself, and the CFP
process and program selection. Both about what was great and should be
kept for next year's edition, and where there's
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:19:45 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
> My main reason for suggesting either one is that I personally am aware
> of at least 2 issues (both related to secondary USB GPUs handling) which
> are only present in master and not in the 1.20 branch and which I really
> would like to
Hi Pekka,
On 09-10-2019 09:47, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:19:45 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
My main reason for suggesting either one is that I personally am aware
of at least 2 issues (both related to secondary USB GPUs handling) which
are only present in master and not in
On 2019-10-08 6:28 p.m., Adam Jackson wrote:
I gave a brief lightning talk about this at XDC Montreal [1], and
nobody seemed to object, but here's a recap for those who weren't
present or have other ideas or preferences.
In short, releases need to happen, and we have CI, so let's just pop a
Hi,
On 09-10-2019 12:23, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 09:59:29 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
Let's keep each other updated, so we don't do duplicate effort. :-)
Ack I will drop you a mail when I find / make time to look into this.
Regards,
Hans
On 10/8/19 1:19 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 08-10-2019 18:28, Adam Jackson wrote:
In short, releases need to happen, and we have CI, so let's just pop a
release out on scheduled dates assuming CI passes.
Given that the Xorg xserver has a lot of hw interaction, we are
never going to
A collection of build and documentation fixes, one preparatory change
for a new xorgproto release, and a fix for a deadlock bug in _XReply.
Thanks to all who contributed.
Adam Jackson (3):
makekeys: Detach ourselves from X headers entirely
xkb: Provide ourselves
libX11 1.6.9
On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 22:19 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08-10-2019 18:28, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > In short, releases need to happen, and we have CI, so let's just pop a
> > release out on scheduled dates assuming CI passes.
>
> Given that the Xorg xserver has a lot of hw
15 matches
Mail list logo
