Re: Strange results from xdpyinfo

2016-04-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 16:47 +0200, Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 08:59:09PM +0300, Ilya Anfimov wrote: > > Such a pity. > > Oh, don't be such a cunt ;-P Let's have less of this, thanks. - ajax ___ xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support

Re: Strange results from xdpyinfo

2016-04-26 Thread Glynn Clements
David C. Partridge wrote: > Specifically there are multiple (many, many) results looking like: If you run "glxinfo", you'll find that they differ in terms of their GLX-specific properties (single-buffered or double-buffered, whether they have an accumulation buffer, and the number of samples

Re: Strange results from xdpyinfo

2016-04-25 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 08:59:09PM +0300, Ilya Anfimov wrote: Such a pity. Oh, don't be such a cunt ;-P Is there any fix for this problem? Fix the client. Reading output of a 3rd process into a static buffer is plain broken. Not sure why it operates on xdpyinfo itfp (I guess it's