Hi,
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 11:59:05AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
My main issue with this is, while we'd like to be the kernel, we have in
no way got the developer/testers bandwidth they have. Generally when
developing a feature for the kernel, you can find someone else to
interact with while
---
Somebody at XDC today said that getting rid of the static MAXSCREENS
limit from the X server would be a Good Thing, and it looked like doing
that to Xext/shm.c would be pretty easy, so I tried it.
This is my first server patch, so review gratefully accepted.
Xext/shm.c | 60
Le 30/09/2009 20:40, Keith Packard a écrit :
Here's an updated patch -- removes the _X_INTERNAL from the .c files,
renames xf86DiDGAInit to _xf86_di_dga_init_internal, and renames
xf86DiDGAReInit to _xf86_di_dga_reinit_internal.
Thanks for previous review.
-keith
From
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 09:35:01AM +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 29/09/2009 19:05, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit :
Checking just for root is insufficient since that does not guarantee
write/read
permissions in XKM_OUTPUT_DIR (for example with sandbox).
Check if we can write a file, as well
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:53:02PM +0200, Simon Thum wrote:
Peter Hutterer wrote:
@@ -587,16 +587,41 @@ clipAxis(DeviceIntPtr pDev, int axisNum, int *val)
/* If a value range is defined, clip. If not, do nothing */
A nit: This is no longer true then.
if (axis-max_value =
After
commit ad5c0d9efa47476ed5cf75c82265c73919e468b4
Author: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
Date: Tue Sep 29 16:43:43 2009 -0700
GLX: Enable GLX 1.4 on DRI2
I'm getting segfaults at server startup in glx/glxext.c:373:
for (p = __glXProviderStack; p != NULL; p = p-next) {
From: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
---
glx/glxcmds.c |1 -
glx/glxdri2.c |6 ++
glx/glxscreens.c| 12 ++--
glx/glxscreens.h|9 +
include/protocol-versions.h |2 +-
5 files changed, 22
---
I didn't test my previous patch right. Sorry. This version doesn't seem
to crash the server at startup. :-)
Review would still be greatly appreciated.
Xext/shm.c | 67 +++
1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff
xf86OpenConsole fails as non-root, at least on Linux. Since the
xf86-video-dummy driver works fine without root privileges or console
access, just don't open the console.
---
I wanted to see how to replace Xvfb and Xfake with an appropriate video
driver for the xfree86 DDX, and needing root
Excerpts from Rémi Cardona's message of Thu Oct 01 01:25:25 -0700 2009:
+if(!(pScreenPriv = (DGAScreenPtr)xalloc(sizeof(DGAScreenRec
^^
Isn't that useless these days?
yeah, just minimizing code churn (that line was re-indented, but
otherwise
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Thanks for giving this a try. The canonical way to do this is to
allocate a screen private index and then allocate memory per-screen
instead of globally, ...
Hmm. I think that's what I did? I followed the pattern in
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 08:04:08AM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:36:39AM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 30, 2009, at 19:43, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Question: tree on people.fdo or branch on the main repo?
branches on the main repo have the advantage of the
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:34:52 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
One thing I was hoping was not to have the options input from the
device configuration again. Having people migrate their setups to hal
was not fun, and now
On 10/01/2009 02:02 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 04:21:07PM -0400, Zack Rusin wrote:
On Thursday 01 October 2009 14:13:15 Greg KH wrote:
Hi,
As discussed at XDC2009 in your talk about patents and xorg, I talked
with the Linux Foundation's Technical Advisory
Currently the root coordinates may fall into ]-1..0] if the subpixel
remainder is less than 0. Screen coordinates mustn't go below 0, so use
miPointerSetPosition to cap off the remainder if the coordinates are below
0.
This is cheating a bit, a more comprehensive solution to deal with subpixels
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:45:16AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
---
glx/glxcmds.c |1 -
glx/glxdri2.c |6 ++
glx/glxscreens.c| 12 ++--
glx/glxscreens.h|9 +
16 matches
Mail list logo
