On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:27:11PM +0200, ext Keith Packard wrote:
I've pushed a couple more minor patches to master today, and I don't
have anything else sitting in my patchq. 1.9 is schedule for Friday, so
if you've got some critical (and well tested) bug-fixes, please let me
know so I can
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Chris Bagwell ch...@cnpbagwell.com wrote:
Suggested xf86-input-synaptics behaviour change:
Its not a terrible problem but I think could stand to be improved. I
propose following change to help further get rid of jumps:
Start tracking previous finger count.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
A simple hack to accommodate various EDID who have detailed modes that
exceed the EDID's max pixel clock. The pixel clock is only defined in
units of 10MHz and often appears as the maximum pixel code of the
detailed
When I try to access bug 28801
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28801
I get the message:
You are not authorized to access bug #28801.
I can see the bugs just fine.
Why does bugzilla hate me? [insert your own joke here]
Pat
---
___
On Aug 20, 2010, at 12:55, Pat Kane wrote:
When I try to access bug 28801
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28801
I get the message:
You are not authorized to access bug #28801.
I can see the bugs just fine.
Why does bugzilla hate me? [insert your own joke here]
It
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:32:03 -0400, Eamon Walsh ewa...@tycho.nsa.gov wrote:
I'm getting a devPrivates assertion failure in SELinuxExtensionInit():
Xorg: privates.c:202: dixRegisterPrivateKey: Assertion
`!keys[t].created' failed.
Looks like a bug in the Intel driver to me -- uxa_resources_init
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:32:03 -0400, Eamon Walsh ewa...@tycho.nsa.gov wrote:
I'm getting a devPrivates assertion failure in SELinuxExtensionInit():
Xorg: privates.c:202: dixRegisterPrivateKey: Assertion
`!keys[t].created' failed.
I've instrumented the server for a bit more privates debugging
