On 4 January 2012 03:50, Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On 01/03/2012 06:06 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
On 3 January 2012 20:27, Ian Romanicki...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On 01/03/2012 11:13 AM, Mike Lothian wrote:
Hi
Ever since these tests went in I get failures during configure:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:12:16PM -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
This module is hosted as an X.Org app and is published as such.
This patch adds some missing packaging files and sets some basic
infrastructure
common to all xorg modules which saves maintenance in the long run.
Hi All,
For the --fb option of xrandr, there is some description below in the man
page. Besides the screen size change, I'm wondering if the display mode
should also be updated to the closest mode of widthxheight if we just
run xrandr --fb widthxheight. Can anybody here give some ideas? Thanks
On 12-01-03 09:42 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:23:15 -0500, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
This series applies some xorg project policies and code reuse from
util-macros.
In some cases it reverts upgrades that were too new for the overall xorg.
There were no bug
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 15:17, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 12-01-03 09:42 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:23:15 -0500, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca
wrote:
This series applies some xorg project policies and code reuse from
util-macros.
In some cases it
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 15:33, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 12-01-04 04:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
While I have the attention of someone versed in buildsystem-fu:
intel-gpu-tools also contains a set of tests for the i915 kernel module
(and the libdrm interface for it). Currently
On 01/04/12 06:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Originally we've abused make check, but that turned out to be a bad
idea because make distcheck automatically runs that. And the tests
check the kernel and not intel-gpu-tools itself, so that didn't make
much sense. Hence we added make test with a quick
We don't want to unconditionally use I/O routines here, since if the
driver is using mmap'd VGA ports then the I/O handle won't be set up.
Tested-by: Jeff Chua jeff.chua.li...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
---
hw/xfree86/vgahw/vgaHW.h |8
1 files changed, 4
From: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:39:33 -0500
We don't want to unconditionally use I/O routines here, since if the
driver is using mmap'd VGA ports then the I/O handle won't be set up.
Hmm, well, reading from mmap'd VGA ports is unlikely to result in the
same
Fixes a compiler warning due to discarding the const qualifier as it
comes back from the option code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
src/properties.c |2 +-
src/synapticsstr.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/properties.c
On 01/04/2012 08:39 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 01/04/12 06:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Originally we've abused make check, but that turned out to be a bad
idea because make distcheck automatically runs that. And the tests
check the kernel and not intel-gpu-tools itself, so that didn't make
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:45:49 -0800
Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Maybe stuff this into a separate function that's a no-op in the 3
case? That would clean things up a little and save an #ifdef in the
middle of a function (always a nice thing).
Or just require updated DRI2
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:00:32 -0800
Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On 01/03/2012 04:28 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:18:27 -0800
Ian Romanicki...@freedesktop.org wrote:
From: Ian Romanickian.d.roman...@intel.com
Instead of having separate
Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org (04/01/2012):
Fixes a compiler warning due to discarding the const qualifier as it
comes back from the option code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reminds me of 1325553573-13476-1-git-send-email-peter.hutte...@who-t.net:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 18:12, Matt Dew mar...@osource.org wrote:
This is the same 'make check' that the tinderbox uses right?
Thread: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-January/028225.html
Forgive me if I'm being dumb here. My thought, on pretty much no sleep last
night, is should
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 16:39, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 01/04/12 06:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
One thing I'm wondering is whether we could easily ship these tests in
some form, so that users could run them from the distro package
instead of grabbing the sources.
Hi,
On 4 January 2012 17:30, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org (04/01/2012):
Fixes a compiler warning due to discarding the const qualifier as it
comes back from the option code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Reminds me of
Hi,
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
On 3 January 2012 00:44, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
synaptics.c: In function 'SynapticsPreInit':
synaptics.c:731:18: warning: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from
pointer target type
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 07:17:24PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
2011/12/2 Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org:
@@ -90,6 +104,9 @@ load_extension_config(void)
}
#endif
}
+
+ for (i = 0; i ARRAY_SIZE(extensionModules); i++)
+ LoadExtension(extensionModules[i],
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:51:38AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
whitespace, plus I don't actually see the change here anyway. erroneous
hunk?
Yeah, just detritus from removing and re-adding it later. Removed,
thanks.
Cheers,
Daniel
___
On 01/04/2012 12:54 AM, Mike Lothian wrote:
On 4 January 2012 03:50, Ian Romanicki...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On 01/03/2012 06:06 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
On 3 January 2012 20:27, Ian Romanicki...@freedesktop.orgwrote:
On 01/03/2012 11:13 AM, Mike Lothian wrote:
Hi
Ever since these
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:37:47AM +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:40:41AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
I also suspect that VNC may use some of these.
Hello Peter, Daniel,
thanks for CCing me.
In VNC we use following:
- mieqProcessInputEvents
You can just call
Hi,
On 4 January 2012 18:45, Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Okay, I looked back at your build output, and I think I see the problem:
* econf: updating Mesa-/bin/config.sub with
/usr/share/gnuconfig/config.sub
* econf: updating Mesa-/bin/config.guess with
X-Original-To: xorg-devel@lists.x.org
From: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:02:30 +
Fixes a compiler warning due to discarding the const qualifier as it
comes back from the option code.
If Daniel Kurtz's analysis of the problem is right, and I believe it
is,
On 01/04/2012 10:55 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 4 January 2012 18:45, Ian Romanicki...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Okay, I looked back at your build output, and I think I see the problem:
* econf: updating Mesa-/bin/config.sub with
/usr/share/gnuconfig/config.sub
* econf: updating
Hi,
On 4 January 2012 18:55, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
X-Original-To: xorg-devel@lists.x.org
From: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:02:30 +
Fixes a compiler warning due to discarding the const qualifier as it
comes back from the option code.
On Mit, 2012-01-04 at 10:56 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 01/04/2012 10:55 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 4 January 2012 18:45, Ian Romanicki...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Okay, I looked back at your build output, and I think I see the problem:
* econf: updating
On 01/04/2012 11:05 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2012-01-04 at 10:56 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 01/04/2012 10:55 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 4 January 2012 18:45, Ian Romanicki...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Okay, I looked back at your build output, and I think I see the problem:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:31:48PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 15:17, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 12-01-03 09:42 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:23:15 -0500, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca
wrote:
This series applies some xorg
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:01:31 +
From: Daniel Stone
Hi,
If Daniel Kurtz's analysis of the problem is right, and I believe it
is, then this diff is just as wrong as the previous diff from Peter.
It also means that the real culprit is Peter's change to constify
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to build the project sources on a fresh machine using the
modular build.sh procedure. Currently I'm experiencing a build failure
in driver/xf86-input-vmmouse and can't figure out how to fix it.
The build is having problems compiling
Hi Trevor,
Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com (04/01/2012):
I'm trying to build the project sources on a fresh machine using the
modular build.sh procedure. Currently I'm experiencing a build failure
in driver/xf86-input-vmmouse and can't figure out how to fix it.
Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.devel/26565
:-D
Thank you. Sorry for not searching first.
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives:
On 12-01-04 02:38 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
I should have added... The shader debugger isn't complete. This is a
prototype/proof of concept. Somehow that got dropped in my earlier mail.
On 01/04/2012 11:34 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:31:48PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 06:07:50PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:41:25PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:01:31 +
From: Daniel Stone
Hi,
If Daniel Kurtz's analysis of the problem is right, and I believe it
is, then this diff is just as wrong as the previous diff from Peter.
It also means
Background: I'm trying hard to bring continuous integration and testing
to the FOSS stack between linux and gnome-shell. That means building
from git, not manual integration via tarballs. The current xorg
autogen.sh scripts just need one minor tweak to match the ones we use in
GNOME. I've been
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:33:46PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 12/02/11 03:31, Daniel Stone wrote:
diff --git a/include/dixstruct.h b/include/dixstruct.h
index 0a85f40..1a4aece 100644
--- a/include/dixstruct.h
+++ b/include/dixstruct.h
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ SOFTWARE.
* translation
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:40:41AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:31:17AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Remove unnecessary _X_EXPORT tags from mi headers.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
some of these are still used by input drivers, most
Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org (04/01/2012):
Background: I'm trying hard to bring continuous integration and testing
to the FOSS stack between linux and gnome-shell. That means building
from git, not manual integration via tarballs. The current xorg
autogen.sh scripts just need one minor
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:50:03AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:31:27AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Unexport all the remaining _X_EXPORTed XFree86 symbols not used by any
drivers.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Needed externally:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:32:31AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 12/02/11 03:31, Daniel Stone wrote:
--- a/dix/dispatch.c
+++ b/dix/dispatch.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int nextFreeClientID; /* always MIN free client
ID */
static int nClients; /* number of authorized
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 00:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org (04/01/2012):
Background: I'm trying hard to bring continuous integration and testing
to the FOSS stack between linux and gnome-shell. That means building
from git, not manual integration via
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:11:55PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:40:41AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:31:17AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Remove unnecessary _X_EXPORT tags from mi headers.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
On 01/04/2012 02:14 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On 12-01-04 02:38 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
I should have added... The shader debugger isn't complete. This is a
prototype/proof of concept. Somehow that got dropped in my earlier mail.
On 01/04/2012 11:34 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012
A touchpoint is ended when no further processing will take place for it.
This includes the situation where there is only one grabbing client, and
the client receives a touch end before it has accepted/rejected the
touchpoint.
This change ensures that a delivered touch end event is converted into
On 01/04/2012 02:40 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:41:25PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:01:31 +
From: Daniel Stone
Hi,
If Daniel Kurtz's analysis of the problem is right, and I believe it
is, then this diff is just as wrong as the previous
Check for identifier first and bail if it's missing (also remove the current
identifier check after we've already bailed due to missing identifiers)
If a driver is missing, warn but also say that we may have added this device
already. I see too many bugreports with incorrectly shortened log
On 12-01-04 05:53 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
Background: I'm trying hard to bring continuous integration and testing
to the FOSS stack between linux and gnome-shell. That means building
from git, not manual integration via tarballs. The current xorg
autogen.sh scripts just need one minor tweak
On 12-01-04 06:33 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On 01/04/2012 02:14 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On 12-01-04 02:38 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
I should have added... The shader debugger isn't complete. This is a
prototype/proof of concept. Somehow that got dropped in my earlier
mail.
On 01/04/2012 11:34
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net (05/01/2012):
Check for identifier first and bail if it's missing (also remove the current
identifier check after we've already bailed due to missing identifiers)
If a driver is missing, warn but also say that we may have added this device
already. I
dixLookupWindow uses dixLookupDrawable internally, which returns
BadMatch when the XID matches a non-Window drawable. Users
of dixLookupWindow don't care about this, just that it's not
a valid Window.
This is a generalised version of the fix for X.Org Bug 23562,
where GetProperty was incorrectly
This reverts commit f04fe06ae244b851b38be824b1a80f2f8a030591.
dixLookupWindow no longer returns BadMatch. No other caller was checking
for it, so this problem is now fixed in the utility function.
Signed-off-by: Christopher James Halse Rogers
christopher.halse.rog...@canonical.com
---
On 01/04/2012 10:26 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 18:12, Matt Dewmar...@osource.org wrote:
This is the same 'make check' that the tinderbox uses right?
Thread: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-January/028225.html
Forgive me if I'm being dumb here. My thought, on
Don't declare where not needed, include stdlib where needed, don't cast
where not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
xts5/Xlib12/XDisplayName/Test1.c |2 +-
xts5/Xlib12/XDisplayName/XDisplayName.m|2 +-
xts5/Xlib14/XUnsetICFocus.m
XDeviceKeyEvent and XKeyEvent are _not_ binary compatible. Expecting a random
byte location inside the device event to be of the value it'd have in a core
event is an amusing pasttime, but highly inappropriate for a test.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
t003() selects for key events on the root window. t005() takes over and then
complains when the focus correctly follows the pointer and an event is
delivered to the root window. If you don't expect events on the root window,
unselect them first.
Submitting a NULL mask to XSelectExtensionEvents
On 01/04/12 21:01, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Don't declare where not needed, include stdlib where needed, don't cast
where not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Peter Huttererpeter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
...except for the typo in the subject line,
On 01/04/12 21:01, Peter Hutterer wrote:
--- a/xts5/XI/XGetDeviceKeyMapping.m
+++ b/xts5/XI/XGetDeviceKeyMapping.m
@@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ int SymsPerCode = 6;
CHECKPASS(1);
ASSERTION def
-# I'm not sure what you could do here, its just saying that there is
-# a reserved value
For a transition from windows A to B, A-parent did not receive an event.
DeviceFocusOutEvents sends to windows ]from, to[, so start with the actual
window, not it's parent.
X.Org Bug 44079 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44079
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
XTS XSetDeviceFocus-7
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
dix/enterleave.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dix/enterleave.c b/dix/enterleave.c
index 2b8c7c5..89a82ab 100644
--- a/dix/enterleave.c
+++ b/dix/enterleave.c
@@ -1299,7
We need to update the master if the device is not a master _and_ it is not
floating.
Triggered since 51437995a5041a8c53c33b508b1607c78a5fa463, introduced in
dc57f89959e549403f8488eb9f23425bd7118b22.
X.Org Bug 44003 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44003
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
62 matches
Mail list logo
