On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
Chris,
I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't
want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another.
Err, what are you talking about?
Cheers,
Julien
___
This driver has not received server updates such as mibstore removal
and conditional compiling of xaa architecture. This indicate an implicite
decisison to remove the driver from active support and future releases.
This driver is used for SGI workstations Indy and Indigo2. Manufacturing
stopped
On Sep 18, 2013 7:50 AM, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
This driver has not received server updates such as mibstore removal
and conditional compiling of xaa architecture. This indicate an implicite
decisison to remove the driver from active support and future releases.
This driver
This driver has not received server updates such as mibstore removal
and conditional compiling of xaa architecture. This indicate an implicite
decisison to remove the driver from active support and future releases.
This driver is used for SGI workstations Indy and Indigo2. Manufacturing
stopped
Hi!
On August 14 I've reposted three patches for xauth to this mailing list.
I did so, because I had discovered that a 'Dr. Tilmann Bubeck' has added
himself as maintainer of the xauth package to the xorg/doc/xorg-docs/MAINTAINERS
file on Jan. 22 2013 - considering the change frequency of this
When there were complaints last year that no one was integrating xauth patches
since there was no maintainer, he volunteered to maintain it, so I let him try.
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-October/034079.html
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-December/034803.html
(Yes,
Hi Tilman,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:28:14PM +0200, Dr. Tilmann Bubeck wrote:
Hi Egbert,
I developed a patch for xauth to fix some nasty problems. I first asked Alan
to apply the patch but he had not enough time to do it. So after some time
he gave me access to Xorg as a commiter (I
Egbert,
thanks a lot! I will try to look at them during the weekend.
Kind regards,
Tilmann
On 09/18/2013 11:32 PM, Egbert Eich wrote:
Hi Tilman,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:28:14PM +0200, Dr. Tilmann Bubeck wrote:
Hi Egbert,
I developed a patch for xauth to fix some nasty problems. I
[PATCH xauth] Look for FamilyLocal if inet or inet6 address is loopback
Based solely on this description, I'd say this is a maybe.
If the address came from resolving a name, as in xhost +localhost,
then I like this. But if the address was specified directly, as in
xhost +::1, then I'd go so
Hi Matt,
On 09/18/13 05:50, Matt Dew wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris,
I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify that? I don't
want a nasty loop where fixing one things breaks another.
From the names of the directory that contains the files affected
Hi Egbert,
I developed a patch for xauth to fix some nasty problems. I first asked
Alan to apply the patch but he had not enough time to do it. So after
some time he gave me access to Xorg as a commiter (I certainly did not
do this on my own).
So my plan was to look after xauth, which I
Satisfy the new function parameters by indicating that no barrier
events were generated.
Changes introduced in xserver commit:
21a15f9a04ec0a6c8f654eef943561e98db2475d,
Pass the event list through to the pointer barrier code to return it
Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca
---
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:46:01PM -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
Satisfy the new function parameters by indicating that no barrier
events were generated.
Changes introduced in xserver commit:
21a15f9a04ec0a6c8f654eef943561e98db2475d,
Pass the event list through to the pointer barrier code to
13 matches
Mail list logo
