With the recent systemd-logind changes it is possible to install the Xorg
binary without suid root rights and still have everything working as it
should *if* the user only has cards which are supported by kms.
This commit adds a little suid root wrapper, which is a bit weird, first we
strip the
Hi All,
Let me repeat the commit msg here as that explains it all:
With the recent systemd-logind changes it is possible to install the Xorg
binary without suid root rights and still have everything working as it
should *if* the user only has cards which are supported by kms.
This commit adds a
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 11:47 +, Stefano Panella wrote:
The reason why the problem happen is that in the vesa driver, as it is
now, has no way to detect the needed alignment of the framebuffer unless
using the shadowFB.
I'd say more like doesn't than has no way to.
The VBE (as I
On 03/ 4/14 11:18 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Beginner question: Are the more consumers of xtrans then just the xserver ?
Yes - we wouldn't have it as a separate module if there weren't.
% grep -il xtrans */*/configure.ac
app/lbxproxy/configure.ac
app/proxymngr/configure.ac
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 22:17 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hello gents,
Can someone take a look at this patch please. Keith already covered the
rest of the series but this patch went below his radar.
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
- ajax
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 17:47 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
Here's a short series to make the server glamor stuff actually
testable. I'm now running glamor for my normal desktop, and the
xephyr bits work too. I pulled out changes that would have required
more from the intel 2d driver: now it's
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:46 +0100, Michael Thayer wrote:
Another would be
to add a return value to the DDX CRTC functions load_cursor_argb, so
that if the KMS driver failed to set the cursor, modesetting could
pass this on to the X server.
Actually we really should make load_cursor_argb
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:01 +0100, Michael Thayer wrote:
Hello,
Another problem that I am running into is that the X11 client part of
our Guest Additions needs to know whether or not the X server VT is
currently the active one, for example so that it can disable our
seamless windows
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 12:45 +0100, Thomas Sondergaard wrote:
My own thought was simply to have the x-server watch a property, say
OPEN_URI, on the root window. Would that be the way to go?
Well, that or add another request to the VNC extension. I'm not sure if
there's a private namespace
Hi Adam,
On 2014-03-05 20:10, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 12:45 +0100, Thomas Sondergaard wrote:
My own thought was simply to have the x-server watch a property, say
OPEN_URI, on the root window. Would that be the way to go?
Well, that or add another request to the VNC
The following changes since commit b634e909895f6001e7d9543e1350b20c82c8c01c:
hw/xwin: More closely follow ICCCM for setting input focus (2014-03-03
14:33:09 +)
are available in the git repository at:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~anholt/xserver glamor-pull-request
for you to fetch
On 03/ 5/14 07:51 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
This commit adds a little suid root wrapper, which is a bit weird, first we
strip the suid-root bit of the Xorg binary, and then we add a wrapper ?
Have you looked at Debian's Xwrapper and considered adopting it, or at least
some of its functionality?
12 matches
Mail list logo
