Re: [PATCH v2] ARC: Add support for ARC architecture

2014-05-09 Thread Alexey Brodkin
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 15:39 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: Xorg server could be built for and run on Synopsys DesignWare ARC cores. These changes are required for successful building and execution of the server. Both little-endian and big-endian flavors of ARC cores are supported.

[PATCH v2] xfree86: fix warnings after MatchSeat patch

2014-05-09 Thread Laércio de Sousa
This patch fixes some compile warnings that arise after commit 7070ebeebaca1b51f8a2801989120784a1c374ae (xfree86: add new key MatchSeat to xorg.conf sections Device, Screen, and ServerLayout) available at git repository git://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/xserver for-keith ---

Re: [PULL] MatchSeat, logind patch, two invalid memory access

2014-05-09 Thread Laércio de Sousa
Patch sent: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2014-May/042386.html CANTATE DOMINO CANTICUM NOVUM QUIA MIRABILIA FECIT Laércio 2014-05-09 0:31 GMT-03:00 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com: Laércio de Sousa lbsous...@gmail.com writes: These warnings are all related to a malformed

Re: [PATCH 09/10] dri3: Add dri3 extension framework

2014-05-09 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:43:41PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: +static void +miSyncShmFenceSetTriggered(SyncFence * pFence) +{ +SyncShmFencePrivatePtr pPriv = SYNC_FENCE_PRIV(pFence); + +if (pPriv-fence) +xshmfence_trigger(pPriv-fence); +

Re: [PATCH xf86-video-nouveau v2] Fix building on older servers without xf86platformBus.h

2014-05-09 Thread Martin Peres
Le 11/04/2014 16:57, Hans de Goede a écrit : Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com Hi Hans, I never received this patch although I was the main recipient :s That concerns me greatly because it means I have no email address immune to dropping emails... Anyway, I heard about it

Re: [PATCH xf86-video-nouveau v2] Fix building on older servers without xf86platformBus.h

2014-05-09 Thread Martin Peres
Le 09/05/2014 15:02, Hans de Goede a écrit : Hi, On 05/09/2014 02:46 PM, Martin Peres wrote: Le 11/04/2014 16:57, Hans de Goede a écrit : Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com Hi Hans, I never received this patch although I was the main recipient :s That concerns me greatly

[PATCH] Fix XNextRequest() after direct usage of XCB

2014-05-09 Thread otaylor
From: Owen W. Taylor otay...@fishsoup.net When XCB owns the X socket, dpy-request is not updated, so NextRequest() and XNextRequest() return the wrong value. There's nothing we can do to fix NextRequest() while retaining ABI compat, but change XNextRequest() to grab the socket back from XCB,

Re: [PATCH] Fix XNextRequest() after direct usage of XCB

2014-05-09 Thread Uli Schlachter
On 09.05.2014 22:33, otay...@redhat.com wrote: From: Owen W. Taylor otay...@fishsoup.net When XCB owns the X socket, dpy-request is not updated, so NextRequest() and XNextRequest() return the wrong value. There's nothing we can do to fix NextRequest() while retaining ABI compat, but change

[PATCH] Fix XNextRequest() after direct usage of XCB

2014-05-09 Thread otaylor
From: Owen W. Taylor otay...@fishsoup.net When XCB owns the X socket, dpy-request is not updated, so NextRequest() and XNextRequest() return the wrong value. There's nothing we can do to fix NextRequest() while retaining ABI compat, but change XNextRequest() to grab the socket back from XCB,

Re: [PATCH] Fix XNextRequest() after direct usage of XCB

2014-05-09 Thread Owen Taylor
Uli Schlachter wrote: unsigned long XNextRequest(Display *dpy) { +unsigned long next_request; +LockDisplay(dpy); +next_request = _XNextRequest(dpy); +UnlockDisplay(dpy); + return (NextRequest(dpy)); Unused variable next_request. Did you really mean to