[PATCH xf86-input-libinput] test: fix a test failure on ppc64(le) and aarch64

Caused by different results in -O0 vs -O2. The resulting array differs only slightly but the initial sequence has one extra zero. That triggers our assert, no other compiler flag seem to be affecting this. Compiled with -O0: Breakpoint 1, test_nonzero_x_linear () at test-bezier.c:157 157

RE: [RFC PATCH xserver] modesetting: re-set the crtc's mode when link-status goes BAD

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:09:51PM -0800, Manasi Navare wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > We have ACKs on the userspace design from both Adams and Eric. > Is this enough to merge the kernel patches? > > I spoke to Eric briefly about this and he gave me a verbal r-b as well. > He said the userspace

Re: [PATCH xserver] xwayland: Do not assume we have a seat

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:19:53PM +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > If a key event is sent programmatically, we may not have an Xwayland > seat associated with it, in which case we end up crashing in > keyboard_check_repeat(). > > This is the case with "antimicro" which sends key events based on

Re: [PATCH util-modular 5/9] build.sh: add the remaining xorg lib(s)

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:40:55PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 27 February 2017 at 21:54, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:09:38PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> On 27 February 2017 at 02:10, Peter Hutterer > >> wrote:

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] modesetting: re-set the crtc's mode when link-status goes BAD

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:09:51PM -0800, Manasi Navare wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > We have ACKs on the userspace design from both Adams and Eric. > Is this enough to merge the kernel patches? > > I spoke to Eric briefly about this and he gave me a verbal r-b as well. > He said the userspace patches

Re: [PATCH util-modular 5/9] build.sh: add the remaining xorg lib(s)

On 27 February 2017 at 21:54, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:09:38PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 27 February 2017 at 02:10, Peter Hutterer >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:11:09PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH util-modular 5/9] build.sh: add the remaining xorg lib(s)

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:09:38PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 27 February 2017 at 02:10, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:11:09PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> Thanks for having a look Alan. > >> > >> On 14 February 2017 at 16:31, Alan

Re: [PATCH util-modular] release.sh: Also update srv_path for older Mesa releases.

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:56:32AM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 27 February 2017 at 01:50, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 04:09:06PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> On 14 February 2017 at 11:39, Emil Velikov > >> wrote: >

[PATCH xserver] xwayland: Do not assume we have a seat

If a key event is sent programmatically, we may not have an Xwayland seat associated with it, in which case we end up crashing in keyboard_check_repeat(). This is the case with "antimicro" which sends key events based on the joystick buttons. Avoid the NULL pointer dereference by first checking

Re: [PATCH util-modular 5/9] build.sh: add the remaining xorg lib(s)

On 27 February 2017 at 02:10, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:11:09PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: >> Thanks for having a look Alan. >> >> On 14 February 2017 at 16:31, Alan Coopersmith >> wrote: >> > This one seems

Re: [PATCH util-modular] release.sh: Also update srv_path for older Mesa releases.

On 27 February 2017 at 01:50, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 04:09:06PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 14 February 2017 at 11:39, Emil Velikov wrote: >> > From: Emil Velikov >> > >> > Otherwise

Re: xserver 1.19.2 call for patches

Hi, > I'd like to do another 1.19 soonish, say middle of next week. If you've > got favorite patches you'd like to see included, please write their > sha1s on the back of a $50 bill and send them to me. > > Alternatively, reply to this email, or send a pull request. FWIW I reckon we should