Hi,
I've just come across this easy DoS with twm and
X.Org X Server 1.19.3 from Fedora 26.
Steps:
/usr/libexec/Xorg -noreset -novtswitch -config /etc/xpra/xorg.conf :10&
#verify we can access the display:
DISPLAY=:10 xprop -root
#start xterm so we have a window, then twm:
DISPLAY=:10 xterm&
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:22 AM, zhoucm1 wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年07月04日 11:41, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:32 AM, zhoucm1 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi xorg-devel guys,
>>>
>>> Anyone can help me?
>>>
>>> I tried two gpu card with four monitors on
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:32 AM, zhoucm1 wrote:
> Hi xorg-devel guys,
>
> Anyone can help me?
>
> I tried two gpu card with four monitors on Unbuntu 16.04, each gpu has two
> monitors.
> By default config, I can see four monitors all are lighting with its
> separate desktop
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
hw/xfree86/man/xorg.conf.man | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/man/xorg.conf.man b/hw/xfree86/man/xorg.conf.man
index ec8d07c65..2cc785345 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/man/xorg.conf.man
+++
Hi xorg-devel guys,
Anyone can help me?
I tried two gpu card with four monitors on Unbuntu 16.04, each gpu has
two monitors.
By default config, I can see four monitors all are lighting with its
separate desktop instance, and the running application with small window
can be spanning all
Hi Pekka,
> [...]
> Maybe more along the lines of xdg_output rather than wp_output. Is
> there something else desktops would need about outputs? Identification
> (machine-wide unique connector name, output number?) has come up
> before, in both human-readable description and persistent
>
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 04:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> So, 3 possibilities so far:
>
> 1. Add the logical output in wl_output
>Looked like a good idea initially, not so much on further
> consideration. pro: It's just an additional event to a existing
>
Hi Pekka,
> please consider that it is impossible to have a stabilization period
> for changes to the wl_output interface. What ever you add will be set
> in stone immediately, before a considerable user base has had a chance
> to try it. There will be no going back once it's there, AFAICT no way
On 03/07/17 01:21 PM, Yu, Qiang wrote:
> Hi maintainers of this mailing list,
FWIW, those can be reached at xorg-devel-ow...@lists.x.org
(-owner@ for any mailman mailing list).
> My colleague David has problem subscribing to this mailing list. He has
> tried both web and mail "subscribe"
Hi maintainers of this mailing list,
My colleague David has problem subscribing to this mailing list. He has
tried both web and mail "subscribe" method. Can you help?
Thanks,
Qiang
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives:
10 matches
Mail list logo