Re: [RFC] Server side glvnd

I was actually just getting ready to send this out. This is what I've come up with for a server-side GLVND-like interface: https://github.com/kbrenneman/libglvnd/tree/server-libglx What I've got there is a proof-of-concept GLX server module that can dispatch to multiple vendor libraries based

Re: [RFC] DeepColor Visual Class Extension

On 07/18/2017 07:18 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 18:04 -0700, Alex Goins wrote: >> This is our latest iteration on the design of the visual class for use with >> HDR >> drawables, handling how colorspace/encoding and pixel format are specified >> and >> interpreted. We've been

Re: [RFC] Server side glvnd

Adding Kyle to To -- he's been working on something similar. On 07/18/2017 08:43 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > I've been thinking about how to get multiple GL stacks to coexist > within the server, along the lines of libglvnd on the client side. This > is a bit of a brain dump, the intrepid can find

[RFC] Server side glvnd

I've been thinking about how to get multiple GL stacks to coexist within the server, along the lines of libglvnd on the client side. This is a bit of a brain dump, the intrepid can find some work in progress along these lines here: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ajax/xserver/log/?h=glxfe The

Re: [RFC] DeepColor Visual Class Extension

On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 18:04 -0700, Alex Goins wrote: > This is our latest iteration on the design of the visual class for use with > HDR > drawables, handling how colorspace/encoding and pixel format are specified and > interpreted. We've been brainstorming this internally for a while, taking

[PATCH] intel.4: Typofix

Add missing verb and period. Index: driver/xf86-video-intel/man/intel.man === RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/driver/xf86-video-intel/man/intel.man,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.9 intel.man ---

Re: [RFC PATCH v3] Add xdg-output protocol

On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 16:01:25 +0200 Olivier Fourdan wrote: > This protocol aims at describing outputs in way which is more in line > with the concept of an output on desktop oriented systems. > > Some information are more specific to the concept of an output for a > desktop

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:40:32 +0800 Jonas Ådahl wrote: > This E-mail is quite long, but I tried to reply to some parts. Hi Jonas, Olivier, appreciated. :-) TL;DR, I don't think there is anything in this email that would actually be an opposition to the xdg-output protocol