Summer of code: accepted students

2010-04-26 Thread Stephane Marchesin
Hi all, Summer of code results have been officially announced. X.Org got 5 projects accepted, congratulations to our 5 students and thanks to all the mentors involved in proposal ranking, your help was very welcome. Here's the sweet list of accepted projects for this year: Christoph Reimann - Imp

Re: X server 1.9 release thoughts

2010-04-11 Thread Stephane Marchesin
2010/4/11 Keith Packard : > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 07:02:27 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> I'd have to agree here, I think we need to do 1.9 following the same >> process again and refine it a lot more. > > Yeah, developing the release process is almost as hard as developing the > code. > The releas

Re: X server 1.9 release thoughts

2010-04-11 Thread Stephane Marchesin
2010/4/11 Michel Dänzer : > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:30 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: >> First off, thanks to everyone involved in the 1.8 release; it was a >> pleasure to work with you. I'm hoping everyone else is as happy as I am >> about our new release process, it seemed to me that we saw a lot m

Re: X server 1.9 release thoughts

2010-04-07 Thread Stephane Marchesin
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 20:44, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:02:20PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On the flip side, unless we have a decent set of video and input > > drivers included in the server, building and testing a new one will > > always be a bit painful. > > Sure, bu

Summer of Code ideas

2010-03-07 Thread Stephane Marchesin
Hey guys, Summer of code is coming on us. I need you to help fill/correct the ideas page at http://wiki.x.org/wiki/SummerOfCodeIdeas I moved some 2009 ideas which are still relevant into 2010. But I don't really know about the state of subsystems I don't follow, for example I know nothing about x

Re: [Xcb] Thinking towards 7.6 katamari, including xcb

2009-10-28 Thread Stephane Marchesin
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:04, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:39:41PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:42:40AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: >> > But, if doing 3 month releases of the whole server tree means that >> > we'll scare OSVs away from our proje

Re: [PATCH] mi: if we fail to process 100 input events due to a stuck EQ, terminate.

2009-04-20 Thread Stephane Marchesin
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 14:53, Matthias Hopf wrote: > On Apr 20, 09 15:40:47 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > It still opens up the can of worms labeled "Denial of Service". > Though one could argue that a graphics operation using 15secs is in > itself a possible denial of service... > Actually, 15

Re: Summer of code

2009-03-10 Thread Stephane Marchesin
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 23:33, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 20:25 Mon 09 Mar     , Stephane Marchesin wrote: >> Is anything being done for the Google summer of code program and X.Org >> ? Just asking, as I heard no echoes about it, and it would be stupid >> to miss the org d

Summer of code

2009-03-09 Thread Stephane Marchesin
Hi, Is anything being done for the Google summer of code program and X.Org ? Just asking, as I heard no echoes about it, and it would be stupid to miss the org deadline... FWIW if no one is working on that, I'd be ok to handle it. Stephane ___ xorg-deve

Re: Default value of Option "EXAOptimizeMigration" in xserver 1.6

2009-02-17 Thread Stephane Marchesin
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 23:18, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Keith Packard wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 16:04 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: >> >>> So, your kernel memory manager is done then? >> >> My point was that we've demonstrated for several years that the legac