Hi,
On 02/13/2014 09:24 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:37:47 +0100
From: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
snip
Right, that is what I was thinking too, so the question then becomes how
hard you will scream at me if I add something like this to xf86-video-intel
linux
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:52:59PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Currently xf86-video-intel is unique in that it is the only video driver
which does backlight control inside the driver rather then letting
something else (ie the desktop environment) deal with it.
This is a problem
Hi,
On 02/13/2014 05:40 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:52:59PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Currently xf86-video-intel is unique in that it is the only video driver
which does backlight control inside the driver rather then letting
something else (ie the desktop
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:37:47 +0100
From: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Hi,
Hi Hans,
Apologies in advance for jumping into the discussion at a somewhat
random point.
On 02/13/2014 05:40 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014
at 04:52:59PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 08:37:47PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/13/2014 05:40 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Otherwise, it seems like we need the
proxy in order to keep the xrandr property available to users and
prevent those who rely upon it in scripts from seeing regressions.
