On 2010-04-08 08:14, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Huh, I hadn't noticed that. I think we should demand that you have the
version with the .pc file once there's a release. For the very few
people who are going to attempt to build the sgml documentation, I
think they can be bothered to grab a newer
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 2010-04-08 08:14, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Huh, I hadn't noticed that. I think we should demand that you have the
version with the .pc file once there's a release. For the very few
people who are going
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 06:11 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 2010-04-08 08:14, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Huh, I hadn't noticed that. I think we should demand that you have the
version with the .pc file
On 2010-04-05 08:58, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
+# XORG_CHECK_SGML_DOCTOOLS
+#
+# Minimum version: 1.7.0
+#
+# Defines the variable XORG_SGML_PATH containing the location of X11/defs.ent
+# provided by
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 2010-04-05 08:58, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
+# XORG_CHECK_SGML_DOCTOOLS
+#
+# Minimum version: 1.7.0
+#
+# Defines the
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 13:23 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2010-04-03 09:59, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 13:12 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
To implement this we need to:
1) Push these commits to doctools and macros.
2) Version bump and release doctools-1.4.
3)
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
From: Yaakov Selkowitz yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net
Trying to find X11/defs.ent with AC_CHECK_FILE does not work when
cross-compiling, and the check assumed that xorg-sgml-doctools is
installed to
On 2010-04-03 09:59, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 13:12 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
To implement this we need to:
1) Push these commits to doctools and macros.
2) Version bump and release doctools-1.4.
3) Version bump and release macros-1.7.0.
Who shall do this, and when?
I
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 13:12 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2010-03-25 20:00, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
All set to go.
Thanks. I modified slightly the doctools patch per the recent thread,
as the .pc.in need not be in EXTRA_DIST because it will be disted
automatically since it is used by
On 2010-03-25 20:00, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
All set to go.
Thanks. I modified slightly the doctools patch per the recent thread,
as the .pc.in need not be in EXTRA_DIST because it will be disted
automatically since it is used by AC_OUTPUT.
To implement this we need to:
1) Push these commits
From: Yaakov Selkowitz yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net
Trying to find X11/defs.ent with AC_CHECK_FILE does not work when
cross-compiling, and the check assumed that xorg-sgml-doctools is
installed to the same prefix which need not always be the case.
xorg-sgml-doctools 1.4 provides a pkg-config
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 03:48 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
From: Yaakov Selkowitz yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net
Trying to find X11/defs.ent with AC_CHECK_FILE does not work when
cross-compiling, and the check assumed that xorg-sgml-doctools is
installed to the same prefix which need not
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:08 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 03:48 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
From: Yaakov Selkowitz yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net
Trying to find X11/defs.ent with AC_CHECK_FILE does not work when
cross-compiling, and the check assumed that
From: Yaakov Selkowitz yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net
Trying to find X11/defs.ent with AC_CHECK_FILE does not work when
cross-compiling, and the check assumed that xorg-sgml-doctools is
installed to the same prefix which need not always be the case.
xorg-sgml-doctools 1.4 provides a pkg-config
On 2010-03-25 17:08, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
That's the right thing to do. I tested the patches and found a scenario
that fails.
When a doctools v1.3 is present, the linuxdoc in hw/dmx/doc do not
build. There is
a requirement that an older client of util-macros behaves the same way
when linked with
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:12 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
From: Yaakov Selkowitz yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net
Trying to find X11/defs.ent with AC_CHECK_FILE does not work when
cross-compiling, and the check assumed that xorg-sgml-doctools is
installed to the same prefix which need not
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:18 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2010-03-25 17:08, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
That's the right thing to do. I tested the patches and found a scenario
that fails.
When a doctools v1.3 is present, the linuxdoc in hw/dmx/doc do not
build. There is
a requirement that
17 matches
Mail list logo
