On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:58:45 -0400, James Willcox wrote:
> Ok, is there anything about these patches that you don't like? What can I
> do to get this in to $XORG_NEXT?
We're already past 1.9 RC1, so we'd be looking to X server 1.10 in any
case.
If you want a constraint rectangle, then I'd sugg
Keith,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:03:49 -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
> > On 06/18/2010 03:08 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:19:04 -0400, Adam Goode
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20334
>
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:03:49 -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
> On 06/18/2010 03:08 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:19:04 -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
> >
> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20334
> >
> > Disjoint areas have always been the issue with this bug; not sure th
On 06/18/2010 03:08 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:19:04 -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
>
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20334
>
> Disjoint areas have always been the issue with this bug; not sure this
> solves it?
>
Hmm, I guess you're right. But maybe at least G
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:19:04 -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
>
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20334
>
> Disjoint areas have always been the issue with this bug; not sure this
> solves it?
Yeah, this simply exposes ScreenPtr->Co
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:19:04 -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20334
Disjoint areas have always been the issue with this bug; not sure this
solves it?
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpnfXWFdOKB3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On 06/17/2010 09:46 PM, James Willcox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached are some patches which add a method of constraining the cursor
> to a given region (or rect, really). The reason I'd like to have this
> is to restrict the cursor to the visible area on an overscanned TV
> screen, though I suppose th
Hi,
Attached are some patches which add a method of constraining the cursor to a
given region (or rect, really). The reason I'd like to have this is to
restrict the cursor to the visible area on an overscanned TV screen, though
I suppose there may be other uses as well. The patches are against t
Hi,
Attached are some patches which add a method of constraining the cursor to a
given region (or rect, really). The reason I'd like to have this is to
restrict the cursor to the visible area on an overscanned TV screen, though
I suppose there may be other uses as well. The patches are against t
