Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl writes:
Is that really desirable?
It has a couple of benefits -- the first is that touch screens and touch
pads often get input while your laptop screen is closed; this prevents
that from waking up the X server.
The second is that turning off input devices
On 10/ 6/13 11:17 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl writes:
For me, moving the mouse has always been the most natural way to wake
up the screen.
Yeah, that's the usual way I wake my machine up as well. However, if you
try this on an OS X machine, you'll find that
On 6 October 2013 20:17, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl writes:
Is that really desirable?
It has a couple of benefits -- the first is that touch screens and touch
pads often get input while your laptop screen is closed; this prevents
that from
Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com writes:
this feature should be optional at the very least.
I certainly didn't want to suggest that it shouldn't be configurable;
the patch was to make it possible to do the power measurements *and*
show just how easy it was to implement the basic operation.
On 10/5/2013 6:11 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:19:15 -0700
This prevents X server wakeup by mouse, tablet or touchscreen
devices.
Is that really desirable?
For me, moving the mouse has always been the most natural way to wake
I
From: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:19:15 -0700
This prevents X server wakeup by mouse, tablet or touchscreen
devices.
Is that really desirable?
For me, moving the mouse has always been the most natural way to wake
up the screen. And I can imagine that touching
This prevents X server wakeup by mouse, tablet or touchscreen
devices. It also saves power by shutting those devices down when the
screen is blank.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86DPMS.c | 24
include/inputstr.h | 1 +
