Sure, that makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
On 11/23/11, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Commit f9e3a2955d2ca7 removing the MAXSCREEN limit left the screen
number too unlimited, and allowed any positive int for a screen number:
Xvfb :1 -screen
Commit f9e3a2955d2ca7 removing the MAXSCREEN limit left the screen
number too unlimited, and allowed any positive int for a screen number:
Xvfb :1 -screen 2147483647 1024x1024x8
Fatal server error:
Not enough memory for screen 2147483647
Found by Parfait 0.3.7:
Error: Integer overflow (CWE 190)
