Hi,
On 21-01-15 18:21, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183654
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com
Thanks looks good now:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Keith can you pick this up, or do you want me to prepare a tree and
Just a style-nit, but C requires the #ifdef at the 0 column not tabbed in,
and it looks better.
this also to me seems like it should be in config/udev.c,
since that is where all the other seat handling code lives.
Dave.
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_platform.c | 39
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183654
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_platform.c | 39 ++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_platform.c
Hi,
On 19-01-15 16:02, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Currently xorg ignores the seat assignments for drm devices because the devices
are initialized earlier in the code. Depending on race conditions, the first X
server will get more than one of the drm devices, which breaks multiseat
systems.
Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:51:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Respect seat assignments when assigning drm devices to
server. Currently, drm devices go to whichever server can get them first.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183654
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Dieter jdie