On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 05:47:25PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
2 week bump, for something that fixes a 4 year old bug.
I suspect the fact that the underlying code is twisty and
incomprehensible may have made people reluctant to even try and review
this patch.
I spent a few minutes
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 08:43:27AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:18:17 +0100, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
Anything else that stops this code from being stuck in master?
I'll take that as a [PATCH] request :-)
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
?
I don't get it,
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:06:16 +0100, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
Should probably also be applied to stabler xserver branches too.
Luc Verhaegen.
2 week bump, for something that fixes a 4 year old bug.
I suspect the
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
Should probably also be applied to stabler xserver branches too.
Luc Verhaegen.
2 week bump, for something that fixes a 4 year old bug.
Luc Verhaegen.
___
xorg-devel mailing list
Should probably also be applied to stabler xserver branches too.
Luc Verhaegen.
From a22bc20721bad506d8fa9772b1258568cbffe7d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:52:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Xv: Fix AdjustFrame when driver implements ReputImage
