Re: [PATCH] glamor: explicitly check for GL_OES_EGL_image

Hi Eric, On 17 September 2015 at 15:52, Eric Anholt wrote: > Emil Velikov writes: > >> Otherwise we'll fail miserably later on as we try to use >> glEGLImageTargetTexture2DOES. > > I thought this had been implied by other extensions we check for, but I

Re: [PATCH] glamor: explicitly check for GL_OES_EGL_image

Emil Velikov writes: > Otherwise we'll fail miserably later on as we try to use > glEGLImageTargetTexture2DOES. I thought this had been implied by other extensions we check for, but I don't see it. I think this would go next to the EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import check

Re: [PATCH] glamor: explicitly check for GL_OES_EGL_image

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 22:10 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > Otherwise we'll fail miserably later on as we try to use > glEGLImageTargetTexture2DOES. > > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov Merged: 139e36d..58d54ee master -> master - ajax

Re: [PATCH] glamor: explicitly check for GL_OES_EGL_image

On 16.09.2015 17:10, Emil Velikov wrote: > Otherwise we'll fail miserably later on as we try to use > glEGLImageTargetTexture2DOES. > > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov > --- > glamor/glamor.c | 5 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/glamor/glamor.c

[PATCH] glamor: explicitly check for GL_OES_EGL_image

Otherwise we'll fail miserably later on as we try to use glEGLImageTargetTexture2DOES. Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov --- glamor/glamor.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/glamor/glamor.c b/glamor/glamor.c index d4a0236..8178785 100644 ---