On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:46:39PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
From b824be59ebf7e9847e9e851eeb6e6c3d80c9a764 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:22:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix yet another crash in pointer event queuing.
ping?
0001-Fix-yet-another-crash-in-pointer-event-queuing.patch
Description: Binary data
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
On 26 May 2012 00:05, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:45:59 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 24 May 2012 04:42, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
what is the trigger for this again? Is this the warp pointer case?
Attaching console output.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:45:59 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 24 May 2012 04:42, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
what is the trigger for this again? Is this the warp pointer case?
Attaching console output.
No you didn't?
Cheers,
Julien
On 24 May 2012 04:42, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
what is the trigger for this again? Is this the warp pointer case?
Attaching console output.
Thanks
Michal
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives:
Hello,
So it's there again on 1.12 branch.
Something dereferences valuator without checking it exists.
Attaching patch
Thanks
Michal
0001-Fix-yet-another-crash-in-pointer-event-queuing.patch
Description: Binary data
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:27:51AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
From b824be59ebf7e9847e9e851eeb6e6c3d80c9a764 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:22:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix yet another crash in pointer event queuing.
