Hi,
On 29-12-14 00:57, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 02:21:04PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
true, both changed locally
Did I miss a patch/pull request with this change included?
Haven't sent one yet, I wanted to wait for
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 02:21:04PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
true, both changed locally
Did I miss a patch/pull request with this change included?
Haven't sent one yet, I wanted to wait for Hans' ack/nak on this, but with
the holiday
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
Haven't sent one yet, I wanted to wait for Hans' ack/nak on this, but with
the holiday period atm it'll take a few more days. I'll send out the pull
after that.
Ok, just checking. I'd like to wrap up 1.17 before I take off for LCA if
possible;
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
true, both changed locally
Did I miss a patch/pull request with this change included?
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
If the suid wrapper is enabled, /usr/bin/Xorg is just a shell script that
execs either /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin directly or the Xorg.wrap binary which then
execve's /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin.
Either way, we end up with Xorg.bin, which is problematic
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:55:07PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
If the suid wrapper is enabled, /usr/bin/Xorg is just a shell script that
execs either /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin directly or the Xorg.wrap binary which
then
execve's
If the suid wrapper is enabled, /usr/bin/Xorg is just a shell script that
execs either /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin directly or the Xorg.wrap binary which then
execve's /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin.
Either way, we end up with Xorg.bin, which is problematic for two reasons:
* ps shows the command as Xorg.bin
*
