On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:40:11AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Heads up: I'll be pushing the following three patches into all xorg
> repositories that need it in the next few days. Speak up now or be forever
> silent, etc. etc.
Ok, done. Please check your favourite repositories to make sure I
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:22:18AM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 25 January 2017 at 02:26, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On 24/01/17 11:32 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 10:40 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >>> Heads up: I'll be pushing the following three
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 11:26 +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> That would be incorrect for xf86-video-{ati,amdgpu}, for which
> patches
> are reviewed on the amd-gfx mailing list, where "[PATCH amdgpu]" is
> ambiguous (because the same list is also used for reviewing kernel
> driver and libdrm
On 25 January 2017 at 02:26, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 24/01/17 11:32 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 10:40 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>>> Heads up: I'll be pushing the following three patches into all xorg
>>> repositories that need it in the next few days.
On 24/01/17 11:32 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 10:40 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> Heads up: I'll be pushing the following three patches into all xorg
>> repositories that need it in the next few days. Speak up now or be
>> forever silent, etc. etc.
>
> Convention so far has
On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 10:40 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Heads up: I'll be pushing the following three patches into all xorg
> repositories that need it in the next few days. Speak up now or be
> forever silent, etc. etc.
Convention so far has been to strip xf86-{video,input}- from the driver
Heads up: I'll be pushing the following three patches into all xorg
repositories that need it in the next few days. Speak up now or be forever
silent, etc. etc.
Cheers,
Peter
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: