On 23 June 2015 at 02:46, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 23.06.2015 04:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 22 June 2015 at 07:56, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 20.06.2015 07:32, Dave Airlie wrote:
at which point you'd want to continue
the versioning from the mesa point to
On 24.06.2015 20:38, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 23 June 2015 at 02:46, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 23.06.2015 04:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 22 June 2015 at 07:56, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 20.06.2015 07:32, Dave Airlie wrote:
at which point you'd want to continue
On 20.06.2015 07:32, Dave Airlie wrote:
at which point you'd want to continue
the versioning from the mesa point to avoid epochs. So I don't
take your argument, the API version is what we ship in the gbm.pc
file, compatible implementations should make the same API changes
in their same
On 22 June 2015 at 07:56, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 20.06.2015 07:32, Dave Airlie wrote:
at which point you'd want to continue
the versioning from the mesa point to avoid epochs. So I don't
take your argument, the API version is what we ship in the gbm.pc
file, compatible
On 23.06.2015 04:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 22 June 2015 at 07:56, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 20.06.2015 07:32, Dave Airlie wrote:
at which point you'd want to continue
the versioning from the mesa point to avoid epochs. So I don't
take your argument, the API version is what
at which point you'd want to continue
the versioning from the mesa point to avoid epochs. So I don't
take your argument, the API version is what we ship in the gbm.pc
file, compatible implementations should make the same API changes
in their same versions.
Other companies may use different
On 19 June 2015 at 02:12, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 June 2015 at 02:02, Emil Velikov emil.l.veli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 June 2015 at 05:08, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 12.06.2015 08:48, Dave Airlie wrote:
We need this for doing USB offload scenarios using
On 15 June 2015 at 05:08, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 12.06.2015 08:48, Dave Airlie wrote:
We need this for doing USB offload scenarios using glamor
and modesetting driver.
unfortunately only gbm in mesa 10.6 has support for the
linear API.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
On 19 June 2015 at 02:02, Emil Velikov emil.l.veli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 June 2015 at 05:08, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 12.06.2015 08:48, Dave Airlie wrote:
We need this for doing USB offload scenarios using glamor
and modesetting driver.
unfortunately only gbm in mesa
On 12.06.2015 08:48, Dave Airlie wrote:
We need this for doing USB offload scenarios using glamor
and modesetting driver.
unfortunately only gbm in mesa 10.6 has support for the
linear API.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
---
configure.ac | 5 +
We need this for doing USB offload scenarios using glamor
and modesetting driver.
unfortunately only gbm in mesa 10.6 has support for the
linear API.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
---
configure.ac | 5 +
glamor/glamor.h | 3 ++-
On 12 June 2015 at 09:48, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
We need this for doing USB offload scenarios using glamor
and modesetting driver.
unfortunately only gbm in mesa 10.6 has support for the
linear API.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
---
configure.ac
12 matches
Mail list logo
