Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-06 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Revert Add shave so that we can see the steaming piles of warnings generated. This reverts commit 181cc08c8908a119fc403f970dea8cc98d3e0b9b. shave was left in the xserver 1.7 release/branch to allow developers distros time to

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-06 Thread Mark Kettenis
From: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:27:27 -0700 Revert Add shave so that we can see the steaming piles of warnings generated. This reverts commit 181cc08c8908a119fc403f970dea8cc98d3e0b9b. shave was left in the xserver 1.7 release/branch to allow

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-06 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 06/10/2009 11:19, Mark Kettenis a écrit : I think this is too early. There is no OpenBSD port/package for automake-1.11 yet. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/util/macros/tree/xorg-macros.m4.in#n457 1.11 isn't mandatory, the macro enables silent rules if they are found. Cheers, Rémi

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-06 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:29:57 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote: Le 06/10/2009 11:19, Mark Kettenis a écrit : I think this is too early. There is no OpenBSD port/package for automake-1.11 yet. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/util/macros/tree/xorg-macros.m4.in#n457 1.11 isn't mandatory, the

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-06 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Mark Kettenis wrote: From: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:27:27 -0700 Revert Add shave so that we can see the steaming piles of warnings generated. This reverts commit 181cc08c8908a119fc403f970dea8cc98d3e0b9b. shave was left in the xserver 1.7

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-06 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:42:33AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Mark Kettenis wrote: From: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:27:27 -0700 Revert Add shave so that we can see the steaming piles of warnings generated. This reverts commit

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:27:27PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Revert Add shave so that we can see the steaming piles of warnings generated. This reverts commit 181cc08c8908a119fc403f970dea8cc98d3e0b9b. shave was left in the xserver 1.7 release/branch to allow developers distros time

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: Revert Add shave so that we can see the steaming piles of warnings generated. This reverts commit 181cc08c8908a119fc403f970dea8cc98d3e0b9b. shave was left in the xserver 1.7 release/branch to allow developers

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:58:10PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: Revert Add shave so that we can see the steaming piles of warnings generated. This reverts commit 181cc08c8908a119fc403f970dea8cc98d3e0b9b.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove shave now that automake-1.11 has AM_SILENT_RULES

2009-10-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:58:10PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: Revert Add shave so that we can see the steaming piles of warnings