On 10/02/2013 02:51 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I broke this, back in:
commit a48dadc98a28c969741979b70b7a639f24f4cbbd
Author: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 21 11:59:29 2011 -0400
glx: Reimplement context tags
In that, I changed the glx client state to not
--- a/glx/createcontext.c
+++ b/glx/createcontext.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ __glXDisp_CreateContextAttribsARB(__GLXclientState * cl,
GLbyte * pc)
ctx-id = req-context;
ctx-share_id = req-shareList;
ctx-idExists = True;
-ctx-isCurrent = False;
+ctx-currentClient =
On 10/08/2013 10:19 AM, Mouse wrote:
--- a/glx/createcontext.c
+++ b/glx/createcontext.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ __glXDisp_CreateContextAttribsARB(__GLXclientState *
cl, GLbyte * pc)
ctx-id = req-context;
ctx-share_id = req-shareList;
ctx-idExists = True;
-ctx-isCurrent =
-ctx-isCurrent = False;
+ctx-currentClient = False;
Should this maybe be 0 instead of False?
Good catch. It's just luck that False is #defined as 0. :) It
should, of course, be NULL.
Well, I'd actually disagree; I think NULL should never be used - see my
blah post of 2009-10-09
Hi,
On 8 October 2013 19:22, Mouse mo...@rodents-montreal.org wrote:
Good catch. It's just luck that False is #defined as 0. :) It
should, of course, be NULL.
Well, I'd actually disagree; I think NULL should never be used - see my
blah post of 2009-10-09
I broke this, back in:
commit a48dadc98a28c969741979b70b7a639f24f4cbbd
Author: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 21 11:59:29 2011 -0400
glx: Reimplement context tags
In that, I changed the glx client state to not explicitly track the list
of current contexts for
