Re: [PATCH 4/6] dix: Remove incorrect comment about privates.

2014-03-10 Thread Keith Packard
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net writes: PRIVATE_ALL was apparently dropped before this comment was added in commit 495fc3eb2d6c98bde82ae1278f89fcf131fd9bf8. Actually, the name was changed to PRIVATE_XSELINUX to reflect the more limited scope of usage. -- keith.pack...@intel.com

[PATCH 4/6] dix: Remove incorrect comment about privates.

2014-03-06 Thread Eric Anholt
PRIVATE_ALL was apparently dropped before this comment was added in commit 495fc3eb2d6c98bde82ae1278f89fcf131fd9bf8. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net --- dix/privates.c | 9 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/dix/privates.c b/dix/privates.c index

Re: [PATCH 4/6] dix: Remove incorrect comment about privates.

2014-03-06 Thread Markus Wick
Am 2014-03-06 18:00, schrieb Eric Anholt: PRIVATE_ALL was apparently dropped before There wasn't any PRIVATE_ALL key neither in xserver nor in glamor. I guess it's just a wrong reference to privates.h, so it's the same as the enum DevPrivateKey itself.